[llvm-bugs] [Bug 42107] New: coroutine_traits on lambda without state
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jun 3 00:31:53 PDT 2019
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42107
Bug ID: 42107
Summary: coroutine_traits on lambda without state
Product: clang
Version: 8.0
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: C++2a
Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: adi at thingdust.com
CC: blitzrakete at gmail.com, erik.pilkington at gmail.com,
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org, richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk
Hi. I'm not sure what the standard does say about this, but to me it sounds
like a bug.
The following code should work in my opinion (on godbolt:
https://godbolt.org/z/1gRoaD):
#include <experimental/coroutine>
template <typename T>
struct task {};
template <typename Ret, typename... Args>
struct std::experimental::coroutine_traits<task<Ret>, Args...> {
static_assert(sizeof...(Args) == 0);
struct promise_type {
std::experimental::suspend_never initial_suspend() { return {}; }
std::experimental::suspend_never final_suspend() { return {}; }
void return_void() { }
task<Ret> get_return_object(){ return {}; }
void unhandled_exception(){ std::terminate(); }
};
};
//works:
task<void> foo() {
co_return;
}
int main() {
//does not work:
auto bar = []() -> task<void> {
co_return;
};
}
The background is that I am trying to differentiate between "safe" coroutines
(coroutines which cannot hold state from the caller: this ptr, reference
parameters, ...) and "unsafe" coroutines (free functions with only value
parameters).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20190603/0276aa57/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list