[llvm-bugs] [Bug 44318] New: Missed Store forwarding optimization as the Alias analysis failed to establish "noalias" information.
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Tue Dec 17 01:22:49 PST 2019
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44318
Bug ID: 44318
Summary: Missed Store forwarding optimization as the Alias
analysis failed to establish "noalias" information.
Product: libraries
Version: trunk
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P
Component: Scalar Optimizations
Assignee: unassignedbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: venkataramanan.kumar.llvm at gmail.com
CC: llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Please consider the following test case.
---Snip--
struct B {
int b1;
int b2;
};
struct C {
int b1;
};
struct A {
int a1;
struct C SC;
int a2;
};
int foo1(struct A * Aptr, struct B* Bptr)
{
int *a = &Aptr->SC.b1;
*a=10;
Bptr->b1 = 11;
return *a;
}
int foo2(struct A * Aptr, struct B* Bptr)
{
Aptr->SC.b1=10;
Bptr->b1 = 11;
return Aptr->SC.b1;
}
---Snip--
For the function "foo1" return value is 10 and can be forwarded directly.
The alias analysis is not able establish the fact that memory accessed by "*a"
and "Bptr->b1" donot alias each other.
Hence the optimization is missed. There is no TBAA information formed for
"&Aptr->SC.b1" and we are not able to prove "noalias" using TBAA.
But for the function "foo2", the Alias analysis proved that "Aptr->SC.b1" and
"Bptr->b1" donot alias each other. TBAA has proper metadata for both the memory
accesses in this case. Here the return value is forwarded.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20191217/74eae60f/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list