[llvm-bugs] [Bug 43050] New: SPEC2017 526.blender_r conflicting values for EnableSplitLTOUnit with -fprofile-use and -flto at link
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 19 11:16:23 PDT 2019
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43050
Bug ID: 43050
Summary: SPEC2017 526.blender_r conflicting values for
EnableSplitLTOUnit with -fprofile-use and -flto at
link
Product: libraries
Version: trunk
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: Common Code Generator Code
Assignee: tejohnson at google.com
Reporter: adandrea at ca.ibm.com
CC: llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Summary:
---------
I'm receiving a linker error building SPEC2017 526.blender_r on a Ubuntu 18.04
POWER9 machine when using options -Ofast -m64 -mcu=power9 -fprofile-use -flto.
Doesn't have an issue linking when using -flto=thin. Please let me know if you
require more information to reproduce.
Actual error:
--------------
/usr/bin/ld: error: LLVM gold plugin: linking module flags
'EnableSplitLTOUnit': IDs have conflicting values in
'blender/source/blender/render/intern/raytrace/rayobject.o' and 'ld-temp.o'
clang-9: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see
invocation)
specmake: *** [/home/adandrea/spec2017/v1.0/benchspec/Makefile.defaults:337:
blender_r] Error 1
Expected error:
----------------
None
Using git bisect it appears the cause is:
-------------------------------------------
604f802fd30d60226fca7d808b7e513e7f80c603 is the first bad commit
commit 604f802fd30d60226fca7d808b7e513e7f80c603
Author: Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com>
Date: Fri Jul 19 23:02:58 2019 +0000
[LTO] Always mark regular LTO units with EnableSplitLTOUnit=1
Summary:
Regular LTO modules do not need LTO Unit splitting, only ThinLTO does
(they must be consistently split into regular and Thin units for
optimizations such as whole program devirtualization and lower type
tests). In order to avoid spurious errors from LTO when combining with
split ThinLTO modules, always set this flag for regular LTO modules.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, inglorion, steven_wu, dexonsmith,
cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65009
llvm-svn: 366623
Steps to reproduce:
--------------------
Peak options used in my SPEC config are:
fprate=peak:
COPTIMIZE = -Ofast -m64 -mcpu=power9 -fexperimental-new-pass-manager
CXXOPTIMIZE = -Ofast -m64 -mcpu=power9 -fexperimental-new-pass-manager
PASS1_CXXOPTIMIZE = -fprofile-generate
PASS2_CXXOPTIMIZE = -fprofile-use=default.profdata -flto
PASS1_COPTIMIZE = -fprofile-generate
PASS2_COPTIMIZE = -fprofile-use=default.profdata -flto
PASS1_LDFLAGS = -L/opt/at12.0/lib64 -Wl,-rpath=/opt/at12.0/lib64 -lhugetlbfs
-Wl,-dynamic-linker /opt/at12.0/lib64/ld64.so.2
PASS2_LDFLAGS = -L/opt/at12.0/lib64 -Wl,-rpath=/opt/at12.0/lib64 -lhugetlbfs
-Wl,-dynamic-linker /opt/at12.0/lib64/ld64.so.2
fdo_post1 = %{BASE_DIR}/bin/llvm-profdata merge default*.profraw -output
default.profdata
runcpu command used is:
runcpu --configfile <config> -T peak 526 -a build
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20190819/55cf9eaf/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list