[llvm-bugs] [Bug 43023] New: Suboptimal code generation for binary-operator parameter pack expansion.
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Fri Aug 16 14:03:02 PDT 2019
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43023
Bug ID: 43023
Summary: Suboptimal code generation for binary-operator
parameter pack expansion.
Product: libraries
Version: trunk
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P
Component: Scalar Optimizations
Assignee: unassignedbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: mike.k at digitalcarbide.com
CC: llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Given the following C++2a code:
bool ref (int a) {
return (a == -1) | (a == 0) | (a == 3) | (a == 4) | (a == 5);
}
bool test (int a) {
return [a](auto... args) {
return ((a == args) | ...);
}(-1, 0, 3, 4, 5);
}
The following LLVM IR is produced with -O3:
define dso_local zeroext i1 @_Z3refi(i32 %0) local_unnamed_addr #0 {
%2 = add i32 %0, 1
%3 = icmp ult i32 %2, 2
%4 = add i32 %0, -3
%5 = icmp ult i32 %4, 3
%6 = or i1 %5, %3
ret i1 %6
}
define dso_local zeroext i1 @_Z4testi(i32 %0) local_unnamed_addr #1 {
%2 = icmp eq i32 %0, 3
%3 = or i32 %0, 1
%4 = icmp eq i32 %3, 5
%5 = or i1 %2, %4
%6 = add i32 %0, 1
%7 = icmp ult i32 %6, 2
%8 = or i1 %7, %5
ret i1 %8
}
Resulting in the following x86-64 assembly:
ref(int): # @ref(int)
lea eax, [rdi + 1]
cmp eax, 2
setb cl
add edi, -3
cmp edi, 3
setb al
or al, cl
ret
test(int): # @test(int)
cmp edi, 3
sete al
mov ecx, edi
or ecx, 1
cmp ecx, 5
sete cl
or cl, al
add edi, 1
cmp edi, 2
setb al
or al, cl
ret
It appears as though a different pattern is being generated when expanding the
parameter pack along with the binary-or operator, and is not being optimized in
the same fashion.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20190816/936195b8/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list