[llvm-bugs] [Bug 41549] New: CTAD fails to find some defaulted template parameters after first declaration of template
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Sat Apr 20 18:25:46 PDT 2019
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41549
Bug ID: 41549
Summary: CTAD fails to find some defaulted template parameters
after first declaration of template
Product: clang
Version: trunk
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: -New Bugs
Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: arthur.j.odwyer at gmail.com
CC: htmldeveloper at gmail.com, llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org,
neeilans at live.com, richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk
Reduced from a test case involving class template argument deduction on libc++
unordered_multimap.
// https://godbolt.org/z/X3OqH0
#if FAIL
template <class H, class P> struct umm;
#endif
template <class H = int, class P = int>
struct umm {
explicit umm(H h = 0, P p = 0);
};
void t() {
umm m(1);
}
====
$ clang++ -std=c++17 test.cc
(OK)
$ clang++ -std=c++17 test.cc -DFAIL
<source>:11:9: error: no viable constructor or deduction guide for deduction of
template arguments of 'umm'
umm m(1);
^
<source>:7:14: note: candidate template ignored: couldn't infer template
argument 'P'
explicit umm(H h = 0, P p = 0);
^
<source>:2:36: note: candidate template ignored: could not match 'umm<H, P>'
against 'int'
template <class H, class P> struct umm;
^
1 error generated.
====
GCC, ICC, and MSVC all agree that this code should be considered well-formed:
CTAD should happily take the defaulted value of `P` from the visible
declaration of the primary template, even though that declaration is not the
first declaration in the source file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20190421/7aded82e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list