[LLVMbugs] [Bug 22522] New: AVX code can be slower than SSE code
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
Mon Feb 9 10:31:09 PST 2015
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22522
Bug ID: 22522
Summary: AVX code can be slower than SSE code
Product: new-bugs
Version: 3.6
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: new bugs
Assignee: unassignedbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: pitrou at free.fr
CC: llvmbugs at cs.uiuc.edu
Classification: Unclassified
Created attachment 13829
--> http://llvm.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=13829&action=edit
IR file
On Sandy Bridge or Ivy Bridge, disabling AVX can lead to faster parallelized
code when the output is unaligned.
Attaching a IR file. You can generate the AVX-enabled code using:
opt -mcpu=corei7-avx -S -O3 vect.ll | llc -O3 -mcpu=corei7-avx
You can generate the AVX-disabled code using:
opt -mcpu=corei7-avx -mattr=-avx -S -O3 vect.ll | llc -O3 -mcpu=corei7-avx
-mattr=-avx
The main AVX loop looks like the following:
.LBB0_6: # %vector.body
# =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
vmovupd -96(%rcx), %xmm0
vinsertf128 $1, -80(%rcx), %ymm0, %ymm0
vmovupd -64(%rcx), %xmm1
vinsertf128 $1, -48(%rcx), %ymm1, %ymm1
vmovupd -32(%rcx), %xmm2
vinsertf128 $1, -16(%rcx), %ymm2, %ymm2
vmovupd (%rcx), %xmm3
vinsertf128 $1, 16(%rcx), %ymm3, %ymm3
vmovupd -96(%rsi), %xmm4
vinsertf128 $1, -80(%rsi), %ymm4, %ymm4
vmovupd -64(%rsi), %xmm5
vinsertf128 $1, -48(%rsi), %ymm5, %ymm5
vmovupd -32(%rsi), %xmm6
vinsertf128 $1, -16(%rsi), %ymm6, %ymm6
vmovupd (%rsi), %xmm7
vinsertf128 $1, 16(%rsi), %ymm7, %ymm7
vaddpd %ymm4, %ymm0, %ymm0
vaddpd %ymm5, %ymm1, %ymm1
vaddpd %ymm6, %ymm2, %ymm2
vaddpd %ymm7, %ymm3, %ymm3
vextractf128 $1, %ymm0, -80(%rdx)
vmovupd %xmm0, -96(%rdx)
vextractf128 $1, %ymm1, -48(%rdx)
vmovupd %xmm1, -64(%rdx)
vextractf128 $1, %ymm2, -16(%rdx)
vmovupd %xmm2, -32(%rdx)
vextractf128 $1, %ymm3, 16(%rdx)
vmovupd %xmm3, (%rdx)
subq $-128, %rdx
subq $-128, %rsi
subq $-128, %rcx
addq $-16, %rdi
jne .LBB0_6
I'm not an expect, so I can't really say what the cause is, but it looks a bit
strange that the output array is not written to sequentially (-80(%rdx) then
-96(%rdx) then -48(%rdx) etc.).
This is with 3.6rc1 as well as 3.5.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20150209/a6b475d7/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list