[LLVMbugs] [Bug 759] NEW: TargetData should be optional
bugzilla-daemon at cs.uiuc.edu
bugzilla-daemon at cs.uiuc.edu
Mon May 1 20:49:48 PDT 2006
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=759
Summary: TargetData should be optional
Product: libraries
Version: 1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: Target Description Classes
AssignedTo: unassignedbugs at nondot.org
ReportedBy: sabre at nondot.org
Right now, TargetData works differently than all of the other Target* classes: instead of
Target::getTargetData() being a virtual method, it returns the instance of TargetData that is
*embedded* into the TargetMachine class. This has several (bad) implications:
1. The ctor to TargetMachine is really complex, taking all of the arguments TargetData does.
2. A TargetData is always required to be around. Consider the case when you have a Module without
any target info: currently we default to creating a SparcV9 TargetData, for hysterical raisons.
3. Extending TargetData is hard to do, because all the targets have to be touched.
In practice, all targets have to provide TargetData, but they should be allowed to provide it like they do
all of the other Target* interfaces.
I will add some other bugs that depend on this.
-Chris
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list