[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [CGP] Simple loop strength reduction for vector values (PR #226197)
Luke Lau via llvm-branch-commits
llvm-branch-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Sep 28 02:51:36 PDT 2026
================
@@ -13,17 +13,28 @@ define void @init_array_of_ptrs_to_structs(ptr noalias %arc_ptrs, ptr %arc_new,
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP0:%.*]] = tail call <vscale x 2 x i64> @llvm.stepvector.nxv2i64()
; CHECK-NEXT: [[BROADCAST_SPLATINSERT:%.*]] = insertelement <vscale x 2 x i64> poison, i64 [[STEP]], i64 0
; CHECK-NEXT: [[BROADCAST_SPLAT:%.*]] = shufflevector <vscale x 2 x i64> [[BROADCAST_SPLATINSERT]], <vscale x 2 x i64> poison, <vscale x 2 x i32> zeroinitializer
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP7:%.*]] = mul <vscale x 2 x i64> [[TMP0]], splat (i64 72)
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP8:%.*]] = ptrtoint ptr [[ARC_NEW]] to i64
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[DOTSPLATINSERT:%.*]] = insertelement <vscale x 2 x i64> poison, i64 [[TMP8]], i64 0
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[DOTSPLAT:%.*]] = shufflevector <vscale x 2 x i64> [[DOTSPLATINSERT]], <vscale x 2 x i64> poison, <vscale x 2 x i32> zeroinitializer
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP9:%.*]] = add <vscale x 2 x i64> [[TMP7]], [[DOTSPLAT]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP11:%.*]] = call i64 @llvm.vscale.i64()
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP5:%.*]] = mul i64 1, [[TMP11]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[DOTSPLATINSERT1:%.*]] = insertelement <vscale x 2 x i64> poison, i64 [[TMP5]], i64 0
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[DOTSPLAT2:%.*]] = shufflevector <vscale x 2 x i64> [[DOTSPLATINSERT1]], <vscale x 2 x i64> poison, <vscale x 2 x i32> zeroinitializer
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[VECTOR_BODY:.*]]
; CHECK: [[VECTOR_BODY]]:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[INDEX:%.*]] = phi i64 [ 0, %[[ENTRY]] ], [ [[INDEX_NEXT:%.*]], %[[VECTOR_BODY]] ]
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[VEC_IND:%.*]] = phi <vscale x 2 x i64> [ [[TMP0]], %[[ENTRY]] ], [ [[VEC_IND_NEXT:%.*]], %[[VECTOR_BODY]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[VEC_IND:%.*]] = phi <vscale x 2 x i64> [ [[TMP9]], %[[ENTRY]] ], [ [[TMP10:%.*]], %[[VECTOR_BODY]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP6:%.*]] = inttoptr <vscale x 2 x i64> [[VEC_IND]] to <vscale x 2 x ptr>
----------------
lukel97 wrote:
Does another pass come along and change the i64 phi to a ptr phi at some point? I would have thought LSR would have usually changed the increment from an add to a GEP to avoid the `inttoptr`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/226197
More information about the llvm-branch-commits
mailing list