[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [flang][OpenMP] Use the LoopSequence-based checks (PR #185300)

via llvm-branch-commits llvm-branch-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Mar 8 08:43:59 PDT 2026


llvmbot wrote:


<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-semantics

Author: Krzysztof Parzyszek (kparzysz)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

Turn on the new loop-construct checks. Remove some checks from resolve-directives.cpp which are now done in the semantic analysis. Update tests.

---

Patch is 30.69 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/185300.diff


18 Files Affected:

- (modified) flang/include/flang/Semantics/openmp-utils.h (+3) 
- (modified) flang/lib/Semantics/check-omp-loop.cpp (+57-26) 
- (modified) flang/lib/Semantics/check-omp-structure.h (-1) 
- (modified) flang/lib/Semantics/openmp-utils.cpp (+9) 
- (modified) flang/lib/Semantics/resolve-directives.cpp (-52) 
- (modified) flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do-collapse.f90 (+8-3) 
- (modified) flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do-concurrent-collapse.f90 (+4) 
- (modified) flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do-ordered.f90 (+10-5) 
- (modified) flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do08.f90 (+12-6) 
- (modified) flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do10.f90 (+2-1) 
- (modified) flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do13.f90 (+12-6) 
- (modified) flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do15.f90 (+10-8) 
- (modified) flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do16.f90 (+4-2) 
- (modified) flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do22.f90 (+4-2) 
- (modified) flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/fuse1.f90 (+2-1) 
- (modified) flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/loop-transformation-clauses01.f90 (+2-1) 
- (modified) flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/tile05.f90 (+2-1) 
- (modified) flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/tile07.f90 (+4-2) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/flang/include/flang/Semantics/openmp-utils.h b/flang/include/flang/Semantics/openmp-utils.h
index a9801cf5b5753..bf02bc4f0252e 100644
--- a/flang/include/flang/Semantics/openmp-utils.h
+++ b/flang/include/flang/Semantics/openmp-utils.h
@@ -133,6 +133,9 @@ static std::string format(const char *fmt, Ts... values) {
   return os.str();
 }
 
+parser::Message &SayReason(
+    parser::Messages &msgs, const std::string &why, parser::CharBlock source);
+
 std::pair<std::optional<int64_t>, Reason> GetArgumentValueWithReason(
     const parser::OmpDirectiveSpecification &spec, llvm::omp::Clause clauseId,
     unsigned version);
diff --git a/flang/lib/Semantics/check-omp-loop.cpp b/flang/lib/Semantics/check-omp-loop.cpp
index b17ece42f475a..36d7984227c6b 100644
--- a/flang/lib/Semantics/check-omp-loop.cpp
+++ b/flang/lib/Semantics/check-omp-loop.cpp
@@ -243,6 +243,7 @@ void OmpStructureChecker::CheckSIMDNest(const parser::OpenMPConstruct &c) {
 void OmpStructureChecker::CheckNestedConstruct(
     const parser::OpenMPLoopConstruct &x) {
   const parser::OmpDirectiveSpecification &beginSpec{x.BeginDir()};
+  llvm::omp::Directive dir{beginSpec.DirId()};
   unsigned version{context_.langOptions().OpenMPVersion};
 
   // End-directive is not allowed in such cases:
@@ -266,8 +267,8 @@ void OmpStructureChecker::CheckNestedConstruct(
   // Check constructs contained in the body of the loop construct.
   auto &body{std::get<parser::Block>(x.t)};
   for (auto &stmt : BlockRange(body, BlockRange::Step::Over)) {
-    if (auto *dir{parser::Unwrap<parser::CompilerDirective>(stmt)}) {
-      context_.Say(dir->source,
+    if (auto *d{parser::Unwrap<parser::CompilerDirective>(stmt)}) {
+      context_.Say(d->source,
           "Compiler directives are not allowed inside OpenMP loop constructs"_warn_en_US);
     } else if (auto *omp{parser::Unwrap<parser::OpenMPLoopConstruct>(stmt)}) {
       if (!IsLoopTransforming(omp->BeginDir().DirId())) {
@@ -289,6 +290,9 @@ void OmpStructureChecker::CheckNestedConstruct(
 
   // Check if a loop-nest-associated construct has only one top-level loop
   // in it.
+  auto [needFirst, needCount, rangeReason]{
+      GetAffectedLoopRangeWithReason(x, version)};
+
   if (std::optional<int64_t> numLoops{sequence.length()}) {
     if (*numLoops == 0) {
       context_.Say(beginSpec.DirName().source,
@@ -300,7 +304,58 @@ void OmpStructureChecker::CheckNestedConstruct(
             "This construct applies to a loop nest, but has a loop sequence of length %ld"_err_en_US,
             *numLoops);
       }
+      if (assoc == llvm::omp::Association::LoopSeq) {
+        if (auto requiredCount{GetRequiredCount(needFirst, needCount)}) {
+          if (*requiredCount > 0 && *numLoops < *requiredCount) {
+            auto &msg{context_.Say(beginSpec.DirName().source,
+                "This construct requires a sequence of %ld loops, but the loop sequence has a length of %ld"_err_en_US,
+                *requiredCount, *numLoops)};
+            if (rangeReason) {
+              parser::Messages reasons;
+              SayReason(reasons, rangeReason.text, rangeReason.source);
+              reasons.AttachTo(msg);
+            }
+          }
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Check requirements on nest depth.
+  auto [needDepth, needPerfect, depthReason]{
+      GetAffectedNestDepthWithReason(x, version)};
+  auto [haveSema, havePerf]{sequence.depth()};
+
+  if (dir != llvm::omp::Directive::OMPD_fuse) {
+    auto haveDepth = needPerfect ? havePerf : haveSema;
+    // If the present depth is 0, it's likely that the construct doesn't
+    // have any loops in it, which would be diagnosed above.
+    if (needDepth && haveDepth && *haveDepth > 0) {
+      if (*needDepth > *haveDepth) {
+        if (needPerfect) {
+          auto &msg{context_.Say(beginSpec.DirName().source,
+              "This construct requires a perfect nest of depth %ld, but the associated nest is a perfect nest of depth %ld"_err_en_US,
+              *needDepth, *haveDepth)};
+          if (depthReason) {
+            parser::Messages reasons;
+            SayReason(reasons, depthReason.text, depthReason.source);
+            reasons.AttachTo(msg);
+          }
+        } else {
+          auto &msg{context_.Say(beginSpec.DirName().source,
+              "This construct requires a nest of depth %ld, but the associated nest has a depth of %ld"_err_en_US,
+              *needDepth, *haveDepth)};
+          if (depthReason) {
+            parser::Messages reasons;
+            SayReason(reasons, depthReason.text, depthReason.source);
+            reasons.AttachTo(msg);
+          }
+        }
+      }
     }
+  } else {
+    // FUSE requires a sequence of perfect nests.
+    // TODO: Defer this check for now.
   }
 }
 
@@ -501,27 +556,6 @@ void OmpStructureChecker::CheckDistLinear(
   }
 }
 
-void OmpStructureChecker::CheckLooprangeBounds(
-    const parser::OpenMPLoopConstruct &x) {
-  unsigned version{context_.langOptions().OpenMPVersion};
-  if (auto *clause{parser::omp::FindClause(
-          x.BeginDir(), llvm::omp::Clause::OMPC_looprange)}) {
-    auto *lrClause{parser::Unwrap<parser::OmpLooprangeClause>(clause)};
-    auto first{GetIntValue(std::get<0>(lrClause->t))};
-    auto count{GetIntValue(std::get<1>(lrClause->t))};
-    if (auto requiredCount{GetRequiredCount(first, count)}) {
-      LoopSequence sequence(std::get<parser::Block>(x.t), version, true);
-      if (auto loopCount{sequence.length()}) {
-        if (*loopCount < *requiredCount) {
-          context_.Say(clause->source,
-              "The specified loop range requires %ld loops, but the loop sequence has a length of %ld"_err_en_US,
-              *requiredCount, *loopCount);
-        }
-      }
-    }
-  }
-}
-
 void OmpStructureChecker::CheckScanModifier(
     const parser::OmpClause::Reduction &x) {
   using ReductionModifier = parser::OmpReductionModifier;
@@ -570,9 +604,6 @@ void OmpStructureChecker::Leave(const parser::OpenMPLoopConstruct &x) {
       CheckScanModifier(*reduction);
     }
   }
-  if (beginSpec.DirName().v == llvm::omp::Directive::OMPD_fuse) {
-    CheckLooprangeBounds(x);
-  }
   if (llvm::omp::allSimdSet.test(beginSpec.DirName().v)) {
     ExitDirectiveNest(SIMDNest);
   }
diff --git a/flang/lib/Semantics/check-omp-structure.h b/flang/lib/Semantics/check-omp-structure.h
index cd98334ad8662..dc84c9d9ae9d8 100644
--- a/flang/lib/Semantics/check-omp-structure.h
+++ b/flang/lib/Semantics/check-omp-structure.h
@@ -326,7 +326,6 @@ class OmpStructureChecker : public OmpStructureCheckerBase {
   void CheckAtomicUpdate(const parser::OpenMPAtomicConstruct &x);
 
   void CheckScanModifier(const parser::OmpClause::Reduction &x);
-  void CheckLooprangeBounds(const parser::OpenMPLoopConstruct &x);
   void CheckDistLinear(const parser::OpenMPLoopConstruct &x);
   void CheckSIMDNest(const parser::OpenMPConstruct &x);
   void CheckNestedConstruct(const parser::OpenMPLoopConstruct &x);
diff --git a/flang/lib/Semantics/openmp-utils.cpp b/flang/lib/Semantics/openmp-utils.cpp
index 63cd9b42e651c..19c793f7dd274 100644
--- a/flang/lib/Semantics/openmp-utils.cpp
+++ b/flang/lib/Semantics/openmp-utils.cpp
@@ -528,6 +528,15 @@ MaybeExpr MakeEvaluateExpr(const parser::OmpStylizedInstance &inp) {
       instance.u);
 }
 
+parser::Message &SayReason(
+    parser::Messages &msgs, const std::string &why, parser::CharBlock source) {
+  parser::MessageFixedText msg(
+      why.c_str(), why.size(), parser::Severity::Because);
+  // Use MessageFormattedText because it owns the storage for the message
+  // text.
+  return msgs.Say(source, parser::MessageFormattedText(msg));
+}
+
 std::pair<std::optional<int64_t>, Reason> GetArgumentValueWithReason(
     const parser::OmpDirectiveSpecification &spec, llvm::omp::Clause clauseId,
     unsigned version) {
diff --git a/flang/lib/Semantics/resolve-directives.cpp b/flang/lib/Semantics/resolve-directives.cpp
index c8ffa22d6bb5f..861fb9f2af2bc 100644
--- a/flang/lib/Semantics/resolve-directives.cpp
+++ b/flang/lib/Semantics/resolve-directives.cpp
@@ -1123,7 +1123,6 @@ class OmpAttributeVisitor : DirectiveAttributeVisitor<llvm::omp::Directive> {
 
   void CheckDataCopyingClause(
       const parser::Name &, const Symbol &, Symbol::Flag);
-  void CheckAssocLoopLevel(std::int64_t level, const parser::OmpClause *clause);
   void CheckObjectIsPrivatizable(
       const parser::Name &, const Symbol &, Symbol::Flag);
   void CheckSourceLabel(const parser::Label &);
@@ -2145,11 +2144,6 @@ std::int64_t OmpAttributeVisitor::SetAssociatedMaxClause(
   const parser::OmpClause *maxClause = nullptr;
   for (auto [level, clause] : llvm::zip_equal(levels, clauses)) {
     if (tileLevel > 0 && tileLevel < level) {
-      context_.Say(clause->source,
-          "The value of the parameter in the COLLAPSE clause must"
-          " not be larger than the number of the number of tiled loops"
-          " because collapse currently is limited to independent loop"
-          " iterations."_err_en_US);
       return 1;
     }
 
@@ -2285,41 +2279,14 @@ void OmpAttributeVisitor::CheckPerfectNestAndRectangularLoop(
         // Recurse into nested loop
         const auto &block{std::get<parser::Block>(loop->t)};
         if (block.empty()) {
-          // Insufficient number of nested loops already reported by
-          // CheckAssocLoopLevel()
           break;
         }
 
         loop = GetDoConstructIf(block.front());
         if (!loop) {
-          // Insufficient number of nested loops already reported by
-          // CheckAssocLoopLevel()
           break;
         }
 
-        auto checkPerfectNest = [&, this]() {
-          if (block.empty())
-            return;
-          auto last = block.end();
-          --last;
-
-          // A trailing CONTINUE is not considered part of the loop body
-          if (parser::Unwrap<parser::ContinueStmt>(*last))
-            --last;
-
-          // In a perfectly nested loop, the nested loop must be the only
-          // statement
-          if (last == block.begin())
-            return;
-
-          // Non-perfectly nested loop
-          // TODO: Point to non-DO statement, directiveSource as a note
-          context_.Say(dirContext.directiveSource,
-              "Canonical loop nest must be perfectly nested."_err_en_US);
-        };
-
-        checkPerfectNest();
-
         ++curLevel;
       }
     }
@@ -2393,25 +2360,6 @@ void OmpAttributeVisitor::PrivatizeAssociatedLoopIndexAndCheckLoopLevel(
           loop = it != block.end() ? GetDoConstructIf(*it) : nullptr;
         }
       }
-      CheckAssocLoopLevel(level, GetAssociatedClause());
-    }
-  }
-}
-
-void OmpAttributeVisitor::CheckAssocLoopLevel(
-    std::int64_t level, const parser::OmpClause *clause) {
-  if (clause && level != 0) {
-    switch (clause->Id()) {
-    case llvm::omp::OMPC_sizes:
-      context_.Say(clause->source,
-          "The SIZES clause has more entries than there are nested canonical loops."_err_en_US);
-      break;
-    default:
-      context_.Say(clause->source,
-          "The value of the parameter in the COLLAPSE or ORDERED clause must"
-          " not be larger than the number of nested loops"
-          " following the construct."_err_en_US);
-      break;
     }
   }
 }
diff --git a/flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do-collapse.f90 b/flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do-collapse.f90
index ec6a3bdad3686..70a84c333236a 100644
--- a/flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do-collapse.f90
+++ b/flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do-collapse.f90
@@ -3,7 +3,8 @@
 ! 2.7.1 Collapse Clause
 program omp_doCollapse
   integer:: i,j
-  !ERROR: The value of the parameter in the COLLAPSE or ORDERED clause must not be larger than the number of nested loops following the construct.
+  !ERROR: This construct requires a perfect nest of depth 3, but the associated nest is a perfect nest of depth 2
+  !BECAUSE: COLLAPSE clause was specified with argument 3
   !$omp do collapse(3)
   do i = 1,10
     do j = 1, 10
@@ -14,7 +15,8 @@ program omp_doCollapse
 
   do i = 1,10
     do j = 1, 10
-      !ERROR: The value of the parameter in the COLLAPSE or ORDERED clause must not be larger than the number of nested loops following the construct.
+      !ERROR: This construct requires a perfect nest of depth 2, but the associated nest is a perfect nest of depth 1
+      !BECAUSE: COLLAPSE clause was specified with argument 2
       !$omp do collapse(2)
       do k = 1, 10
         print *, "hello"
@@ -23,6 +25,8 @@ program omp_doCollapse
     end do
   end do
 
+  !ERROR: This construct requires a perfect nest of depth 2, but the associated nest is a perfect nest of depth 1
+  !BECAUSE: COLLAPSE clause was specified with argument 2
   !$omp parallel do collapse(2)
     do i = 1, 3
       !ERROR: Loop control is not present in the DO LOOP
@@ -31,7 +35,8 @@ program omp_doCollapse
       end do
     end do
 
-  !ERROR: The value of the parameter in the COLLAPSE or ORDERED clause must not be larger than the number of nested loops following the construct.
+  !ERROR: This construct requires a perfect nest of depth 2, but the associated nest is a perfect nest of depth 1
+  !BECAUSE: COLLAPSE clause was specified with argument 2
   !ERROR: At most one COLLAPSE clause can appear on the SIMD directive
   !$omp simd collapse(2) collapse(1)
   do i = 1, 4
diff --git a/flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do-concurrent-collapse.f90 b/flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do-concurrent-collapse.f90
index 355626f6e73b9..3e382eb3cc4d4 100644
--- a/flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do-concurrent-collapse.f90
+++ b/flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do-concurrent-collapse.f90
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 !RUN: %python %S/../test_errors.py %s %flang -fopenmp
 
 integer :: i, j
+! ERROR: This construct requires a perfect nest of depth 2, but the associated nest is a perfect nest of depth 1
+! BECAUSE: COLLAPSE clause was specified with argument 2
 ! ERROR: DO CONCURRENT loops cannot be used with the COLLAPSE clause.
 !$omp parallel do collapse(2)
 do i = 1, 1
@@ -30,6 +32,8 @@
   print *, j
 end do
 
+! ERROR: This construct requires a perfect nest of depth 2, but the associated nest is a perfect nest of depth 1
+! BECAUSE: COLLAPSE clause was specified with argument 2
 ! ERROR: DO CONCURRENT loops cannot be used with the COLLAPSE clause.
 !$omp loop collapse(2)
 do i = 1, 1
diff --git a/flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do-ordered.f90 b/flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do-ordered.f90
index 79ded3e1b6fe6..00fdd2dc966b5 100644
--- a/flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do-ordered.f90
+++ b/flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do-ordered.f90
@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@
 
 program omp_doOrdered
   integer:: i,j
-  !ERROR: The value of the parameter in the COLLAPSE or ORDERED clause must not be larger than the number of nested loops following the construct.
+  !ERROR: This construct requires a perfect nest of depth 3, but the associated nest is a perfect nest of depth 2
+  !BECAUSE: ORDERED clause was specified with argument 3
   !$omp do ordered(3)
   do i = 1,10
     do j = 1, 10
@@ -15,7 +16,8 @@ program omp_doOrdered
 
   do i = 1,10
     do j = 1, 10
-      !ERROR: The value of the parameter in the COLLAPSE or ORDERED clause must not be larger than the number of nested loops following the construct.
+      !ERROR: This construct requires a perfect nest of depth 2, but the associated nest is a perfect nest of depth 1
+      !BECAUSE: ORDERED clause was specified with argument 2
       !$omp do ordered(2)
       do k = 1, 10
         print *, "hello"
@@ -24,7 +26,8 @@ program omp_doOrdered
     end do
   end do
 
-  !ERROR: The value of the parameter in the COLLAPSE or ORDERED clause must not be larger than the number of nested loops following the construct.
+  !ERROR: This construct requires a perfect nest of depth 2, but the associated nest is a perfect nest of depth 1
+  !BECAUSE: ORDERED clause was specified with argument 2
   !$omp do ordered(2)
   do i = 1,10
     !ERROR: An ORDERED directive without the DEPEND clause must be closely nested in a worksharing-loop (or worksharing-loop SIMD) region with ORDERED clause without the parameter
@@ -36,7 +39,8 @@ program omp_doOrdered
   end do
   !$omp end do
 
-  !ERROR: The value of the parameter in the COLLAPSE or ORDERED clause must not be larger than the number of nested loops following the construct.
+  !ERROR: This construct requires a perfect nest of depth 3, but the associated nest is a perfect nest of depth 2
+  !BECAUSE: ORDERED clause was specified with argument 3
   !$omp do collapse(1) ordered(3)
   do i = 1,10
     do j = 1, 10
@@ -46,7 +50,8 @@ program omp_doOrdered
   !$omp end do
 
   !$omp parallel num_threads(4)
-  !ERROR: The value of the parameter in the COLLAPSE or ORDERED clause must not be larger than the number of nested loops following the construct.
+  !ERROR: This construct requires a perfect nest of depth 2, but the associated nest is a perfect nest of depth 1
+  !BECAUSE: ORDERED clause was specified with argument 2
   !$omp do ordered(2) collapse(1)
   do i = 1,10
     !ERROR: An ORDERED directive without the DEPEND clause must be closely nested in a worksharing-loop (or worksharing-loop SIMD) region with ORDERED clause without the parameter
diff --git a/flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do08.f90 b/flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do08.f90
index 5143dff0dd315..8ab02a0d9acbf 100644
--- a/flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do08.f90
+++ b/flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do08.f90
@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@ program omp
   logical cond(10,10,10)
   cond = .false.
 
-  !ERROR: The value of the parameter in the COLLAPSE or ORDERED clause must not be larger than the number of nested loops following the construct.
+  !ERROR: This construct requires a perfect nest of depth 3, but the associated nest is a perfect nest of depth 1
+  !BECAUSE: COLLAPSE clause was specified with argument 3
   !$omp do  collapse(3)
   do i = 0, 10
     !ERROR: CYCLE statement to non-innermost associated loop of an OpenMP DO construct
@@ -20,7 +21,8 @@ program omp
   end do
   !$omp end do
 
-  !ERROR: The value of the parameter in the COLLAPSE or ORDERED clause must not be larger than the number of nested loops following the construct.
+  !ERROR: This construct requires a perfect nest of depth 3, but the associated nest is a perfect nest of depth 2
+  !BECAUSE: COLLAPSE clause was specified with argument 3
   !$omp do  collapse(3)
   do i = 0, 10
     do j = 0, 10
@@ -33,7 +35,8 @@ program omp
   end do
   !$omp end do
 
-  !ERROR: The value of the parameter in the COLLAPSE or ORDERED clause must not be larger than the number of nested loops following the construct.
+  !ERROR: This construct requires a perfect nest of depth 2, but the associated nest is a perfect nest of depth 1
+  !BECAUSE: COLLAPSE clause was specified with argument 2
   !$omp do  collapse(2)
   do i = 0, 10
     !ERROR: CYCLE statement to non-innermost associated loop of an OpenMP DO construct
@@ -47,7 +50,8 @@ program omp
   !$omp end do
 
 
-  !ERROR: The value of the parameter in the COLLAPSE or ORDERED clause must not be larger than the number of nested loops following the construct.
+  !ERROR: This construct requires a perfect nest of depth 2, but the associated nest is a perfect nest of depth 1
+  !BECAUSE: COLLAPSE clause was specified with argument 2
   !$omp do  collapse(2)
   foo: do i = 0, 10
     !ERROR: CYCLE statement to non-innermost associated loop of an OpenMP DO construct
@@ -61,7 +65,8 @@ program omp
   !$omp end do
 
 
-  !ERROR: The value of the parameter in the COLLAPSE or ORDERED clause must not be larger than the number of nested loops following the construct.
+  !ERROR: This construct requires a perfect nest of depth 3, but the associated nest is a perfect nest of depth 2
+  !BECAUSE: COLLAPSE clause was specified with argument 3
   !$omp do collapse(3)
   do 60 i=2,200,2
     do j=1,10
@@ -124,7 +129,8 @@ program omp
   end do foo
   !$omp end do
 
-  !ERROR: The value of the parameter in the COLLAPSE or ORDERED clause must not be larger than the number of nested loops following the construct.
+  !ERROR: This construct requires a perfect nest of depth 3, but the associated nest is a perfect nest of depth 2
+  !BECAUSE: ORDERED clause was specified with argument 3
   !$omp do  collapse(2) ordered(3)
   foo: do i = 0, 10
     foo1: do j = 0, 10
diff --git a/flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do10.f90 b/flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do10.f90
index 936d94d591369..b609567c4d93d 100644
--- a/flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/do10.f90
+++ b/flang/test/Semant...
[truncated]

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/185300


More information about the llvm-branch-commits mailing list