[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] IR: Introduce "float-abi" module flag (PR #210821)

[Alex Rønne Petersen via llvm-branch-commits]

alexrp wrote:

> Why do we need a separate float-abi, rather than making it a part of target-abi?

I don't have a super strong opinion here, but I will say that, over in Zig land, we've been discussing the future of our target triple syntax and came to the same conclusion as Matt regarding combinatorial explosion; almost any target could theoretically have a soft float ABI that combines with any of its platform ABIs. So we're very likely moving towards float ABI being a separate field.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/210821