[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] DAG: Gracefully diagnose missing lrint/lround float-operand libcalls (PR #215034)

[Diana Picus via llvm-branch-commits]

rovka wrote:

> > Is this different from #215064? Seems to have the same title and +/- stats.
> 
> Yes, this one goes through illegal FP type legalization, the other integer. They are different failure paths for the same calls

Are you sure? Unless there's something really wrong with my browser, they both seem to be introducing `DAGTypeLegalizer::ExpandFloatOp_XRINT_XROUND` in LegalizeFloatTypes.cpp. Maybe there was a mishap with the branches?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/215034