[llvm-branch-commits] [RISC-V][RVY] Add a DataLayout component for CHERI capabilities (PR #177249)

[via llvm-branch-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp -- llvm/lib/TargetParser/TargetDataLayout.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````

:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/TargetParser/TargetDataLayout.cpp b/llvm/lib/TargetParser/TargetDataLayout.cpp
index 9d3d493be..ed04ccb53 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/TargetParser/TargetDataLayout.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/TargetParser/TargetDataLayout.cpp
@@ -298,7 +298,8 @@ static std::string computeRISCVDataLayout(const Triple &TT, StringRef ABIName) {
 
   // TODO: Maybe we should move RISCVABI to TargetParser, so we can reuse that
   // logic here instead of duplicating the string handling?
-  bool IsRVYPurecapABI = ABIName.starts_with("il32pc64") || ABIName.starts_with("l64pc128");
+  bool IsRVYPurecapABI =
+      ABIName.starts_with("il32pc64") || ABIName.starts_with("l64pc128");
 
   // Pointer and integer sizes.
   if (TT.isRISCV64()) {

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/177249