[llvm-branch-commits] [mlir] [mlir][omp] Improve canonloop/iv naming (PR #159773)

[Tom Eccles via llvm-branch-commits]

tblah wrote:

Thanks for the replies.

> Do you have a suggestion which operation? Need to be an operation that takes at least two region arguments.

The reduction and privatisation declaration operations have multiple regions. I can't imagine why we would ever generate canonical loops inside of them but it should work for testing this.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159773