[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [FlowSensitive] [StatusOr] [6/N] Support pointer comparison (PR #163875)

[Jan Voung via llvm-branch-commits]

================
@@ -168,6 +168,18 @@ static auto isNotOkStatusCall() {
       "::absl::UnimplementedError", "::absl::UnknownError"))));
 }
 
+static auto isPointerComparisonOperatorCall(std::string operator_name) {
+  using namespace ::clang::ast_matchers; // NOLINT: Too many names
+  return binaryOperator(
+      hasOperatorName(operator_name),
+      hasLHS(
+          anyOf(hasType(hasCanonicalType(pointerType(pointee(statusOrType())))),
----------------
jvoung wrote:

can the anyOf be deeper for just the (statusOrType, statusType) part?  (if that helps matching performance)? 



https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/163875