[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [BOLT][BTI] Add MCPlusBuilder::updateBTIVariant (PR #167308)

[via llvm-branch-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions h,cpp -- bolt/include/bolt/Core/MCPlusBuilder.h bolt/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64MCPlusBuilder.cpp bolt/unittests/Core/MCPlusBuilder.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````

:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/bolt/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64MCPlusBuilder.cpp b/bolt/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64MCPlusBuilder.cpp
index b92e5b2df..eb91346bb 100644
--- a/bolt/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64MCPlusBuilder.cpp
+++ b/bolt/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64MCPlusBuilder.cpp
@@ -2773,7 +2773,6 @@ public:
            Inst.getOpcode() == AArch64::PACIBSP;
   }
 
-
   void updateBTIVariant(MCInst &Inst, bool CallTarget,
                         bool JumpTarget) const override {
     assert(Inst.getOpcode() == AArch64::HINT && "Not a BTI instruction.");

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/167308