[llvm-branch-commits] Add SimplifyTypeTests pass. (PR #141327)
via llvm-branch-commits
llvm-branch-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri May 23 20:15:56 PDT 2025
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: Peter Collingbourne (pcc)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
This pass figures out whether inlining has exposed a constant address to
a lowered type test, and remove the test if so and the address is known
to pass the test. Unfortunately this pass ends up needing to reverse
engineer what LowerTypeTests did; this is currently inherent to the design
of ThinLTO importing where LowerTypeTests needs to run at the start.
TODO: Add tests.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141327.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/IPO/LowerTypeTests.h (+5)
- (modified) llvm/lib/Passes/PassBuilderPipelines.cpp (+2)
- (modified) llvm/lib/Passes/PassRegistry.def (+1)
- (modified) llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/LowerTypeTests.cpp (+61)
``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/IPO/LowerTypeTests.h b/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/IPO/LowerTypeTests.h
index 02adcd8bfd45d..40f2d2c4fadf7 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/IPO/LowerTypeTests.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/IPO/LowerTypeTests.h
@@ -223,6 +223,11 @@ class LowerTypeTestsPass : public PassInfoMixin<LowerTypeTestsPass> {
PreservedAnalyses run(Module &M, ModuleAnalysisManager &AM);
};
+class SimplifyTypeTestsPass : public PassInfoMixin<SimplifyTypeTestsPass> {
+public:
+ PreservedAnalyses run(Module &M, ModuleAnalysisManager &AM);
+};
+
} // end namespace llvm
#endif // LLVM_TRANSFORMS_IPO_LOWERTYPETESTS_H
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Passes/PassBuilderPipelines.cpp b/llvm/lib/Passes/PassBuilderPipelines.cpp
index f3654600c5abb..e3adceed7d70a 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Passes/PassBuilderPipelines.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Passes/PassBuilderPipelines.cpp
@@ -1464,6 +1464,8 @@ PassBuilder::buildModuleOptimizationPipeline(OptimizationLevel Level,
if (!LTOPreLink)
MPM.addPass(EliminateAvailableExternallyPass());
+ MPM.addPass(SimplifyTypeTestsPass());
+
// Do RPO function attribute inference across the module to forward-propagate
// attributes where applicable.
// FIXME: Is this really an optimization rather than a canonicalization?
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Passes/PassRegistry.def b/llvm/lib/Passes/PassRegistry.def
index 94dabe290213d..35ad73738d71d 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Passes/PassRegistry.def
+++ b/llvm/lib/Passes/PassRegistry.def
@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ MODULE_PASS("jmc-instrumenter", JMCInstrumenterPass())
MODULE_PASS("lower-emutls", LowerEmuTLSPass())
MODULE_PASS("lower-global-dtors", LowerGlobalDtorsPass())
MODULE_PASS("lower-ifunc", LowerIFuncPass())
+MODULE_PASS("simplify-type-tests", SimplifyTypeTestsPass())
MODULE_PASS("lowertypetests", LowerTypeTestsPass())
MODULE_PASS("fatlto-cleanup", FatLtoCleanup())
MODULE_PASS("pgo-force-function-attrs", PGOForceFunctionAttrsPass(PGOOpt ? PGOOpt->ColdOptType : PGOOptions::ColdFuncOpt::Default))
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/LowerTypeTests.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/LowerTypeTests.cpp
index 428c4641a7f56..344ac9f5a8f95 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/LowerTypeTests.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/LowerTypeTests.cpp
@@ -2456,3 +2456,64 @@ PreservedAnalyses LowerTypeTestsPass::run(Module &M,
return PreservedAnalyses::all();
return PreservedAnalyses::none();
}
+
+PreservedAnalyses SimplifyTypeTestsPass::run(Module &M,
+ ModuleAnalysisManager &AM) {
+ bool Changed = false;
+ // Figure out whether inlining has exposed a constant address to a lowered
+ // type test, and remove the test if so and the address is known to pass the
+ // test. Unfortunately this pass ends up needing to reverse engineer what
+ // LowerTypeTests did; this is currently inherent to the design of ThinLTO
+ // importing where LowerTypeTests needs to run at the start.
+ for (auto &GV : M.globals()) {
+ if (!GV.getName().starts_with("__typeid_") ||
+ !GV.getName().ends_with("_global_addr"))
+ continue;
+ auto *MD = MDString::get(M.getContext(),
+ GV.getName().substr(9, GV.getName().size() - 21));
+ auto MaySimplify = [&](Value *Op) {
+ auto *PtrAsInt = dyn_cast<ConstantExpr>(Op);
+ if (!PtrAsInt || PtrAsInt->getOpcode() != Instruction::PtrToInt)
+ return false;
+ auto *Ptr = PtrAsInt->getOperand(0);
+ if (auto *GV = dyn_cast<GlobalValue>(Ptr))
+ if (auto *CFIGV = M.getNamedValue((GV->getName() + ".cfi").str()))
+ Ptr = CFIGV;
+ return isKnownTypeIdMember(MD, M.getDataLayout(), Ptr, 0);
+ };
+ for (User *U : GV.users()) {
+ auto *CE = dyn_cast<ConstantExpr>(U);
+ if (!CE || CE->getOpcode() != Instruction::PtrToInt)
+ continue;
+ for (Use &U : make_early_inc_range(CE->uses())) {
+ auto *CE = dyn_cast<ConstantExpr>(U.getUser());
+ if (U.getOperandNo() == 1 && CE &&
+ CE->getOpcode() == Instruction::Sub &&
+ MaySimplify(CE->getOperand(0))) {
+ // This is a computation of PtrOffset as generated by
+ // LowerTypeTestsModule::lowerTypeTestCall above. If
+ // isKnownTypeIdMember passes we just pretend it evaluated to 0. This
+ // should cause later passes to remove the range and alignment checks.
+ // The bitset checks won't be removed but those are uncommon.
+ CE->replaceAllUsesWith(ConstantInt::get(CE->getType(), 0));
+ Changed = true;
+ }
+ auto *CI = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(U.getUser());
+ if (U.getOperandNo() == 1 && CI &&
+ CI->getPredicate() == CmpInst::ICMP_EQ &&
+ MaySimplify(CI->getOperand(0))) {
+ // This is an equality comparison (TypeTestResolution::Single case in
+ // lowerTypeTestCall). In this case we just replace the comparison
+ // with true.
+ CI->replaceAllUsesWith(ConstantInt::getTrue(M.getContext()));
+ CI->eraseFromParent();
+ Changed = true;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!Changed)
+ return PreservedAnalyses::all();
+ return PreservedAnalyses::none();
+}
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141327
More information about the llvm-branch-commits
mailing list