[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [KeyInstr][Clang] Break and Continue stmt atoms (PR #141618)

[Orlando Cazalet-Hyams via llvm-branch-commits]

OCHyams wrote:

Nope that didn't seem to work. I'll land it manually...

> will destructors that run when "break"ing out of a loop get the key-ness of the "break" statement? (This might not be a bad thing at all).

Similar answer to elsewhere - calls aren't annotated by the front end, instead picked up in DWARF emission. If that changes, yes there's a risk, but imo it's a low risk.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141618