[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [AVR] Backport #118015 and #121498 (PR #125081)

[Nikita Popov via llvm-branch-commits]

nikic wrote:

> > because the changes to shouldForceRelocation are ABI-breaking.
> 
> Huh, interesting - out of curiosity, why do they break the ABI if those jumps are local to functions?

Ah sorry, I meant that they break the ABI of libLLVM.so by adding an additional parameter to an exported function, not the ABI of the generated code.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125081