[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [DXIL] Add support for root signature flag element in DXContainer (PR #123147)
Damyan Pepper via llvm-branch-commits
llvm-branch-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jan 30 15:17:28 PST 2025
================
@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+//===- DXILRootSignature.cpp - DXIL Root Signature helper objects
+//---------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+///
+/// \file This file contains helper objects and APIs for working with DXIL
+/// Root Signatures.
+///
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+#include "DXILRootSignature.h"
+#include "DirectX.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/StringSwitch.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/Constants.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/Metadata.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/Module.h"
+
+using namespace llvm;
+using namespace llvm::dxil;
+
+static bool parseRootFlags(ModuleRootSignature *MRS, MDNode *RootFlagNode) {
+
+ assert(RootFlagNode->getNumOperands() == 2 &&
+ "Invalid format for RootFlag Element");
+ auto *Flag = mdconst::extract<ConstantInt>(RootFlagNode->getOperand(1));
+ auto Value = Flag->getZExtValue();
+
+ // Root Element validation, as specified:
+ // https://github.com/llvm/wg-hlsl/blob/main/proposals/0002-root-signature-in-clang.md#validations-during-dxil-generation
+ assert((Value & ~0x80000fff) == 0 && "Invalid flag for RootFlag Element");
+
+ MRS->Flags = Value;
+ return false;
+}
+
+static bool parseRootSignatureElement(ModuleRootSignature *MRS,
+ MDNode *Element) {
+ MDString *ElementText = cast<MDString>(Element->getOperand(0));
+ assert(ElementText != nullptr &&
+ "First preoperty of element is not a string");
+
+ RootSignatureElementKind ElementKind =
+ StringSwitch<RootSignatureElementKind>(ElementText->getString())
+ .Case("RootFlags", RootSignatureElementKind::RootFlags)
+ .Case("RootConstants", RootSignatureElementKind::RootConstants)
+ .Case("RootCBV", RootSignatureElementKind::RootDescriptor)
+ .Case("RootSRV", RootSignatureElementKind::RootDescriptor)
+ .Case("RootUAV", RootSignatureElementKind::RootDescriptor)
+ .Case("Sampler", RootSignatureElementKind::RootDescriptor)
+ .Case("DescriptorTable", RootSignatureElementKind::DescriptorTable)
+ .Case("StaticSampler", RootSignatureElementKind::StaticSampler)
+ .Default(RootSignatureElementKind::None);
+
+ switch (ElementKind) {
+
+ case RootSignatureElementKind::RootFlags: {
+ return parseRootFlags(MRS, Element);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ case RootSignatureElementKind::RootConstants:
+ case RootSignatureElementKind::RootDescriptor:
+ case RootSignatureElementKind::DescriptorTable:
+ case RootSignatureElementKind::StaticSampler:
+ case RootSignatureElementKind::None:
+ llvm_unreachable("Not Implemented yet");
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+bool ModuleRootSignature::parse(int32_t Version, NamedMDNode *Root) {
----------------
damyanp wrote:
Thanks - I didn't realize this was missed from the design. All the more reason to get the design figured out before implementing it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123147
More information about the llvm-branch-commits
mailing list