[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [llvm] [mlir] [MLIR][OpenMP] Introduce overlapped record type map support (PR #119588)
Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
llvm-branch-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jan 24 06:38:58 PST 2025
================
@@ -2979,39 +2979,61 @@ static int getMapDataMemberIdx(MapInfoData &mapData, omp::MapInfoOp memberOp) {
return std::distance(mapData.MapClause.begin(), res);
}
-static omp::MapInfoOp getFirstOrLastMappedMemberPtr(omp::MapInfoOp mapInfo,
- bool first) {
- ArrayAttr indexAttr = mapInfo.getMembersIndexAttr();
- // Only 1 member has been mapped, we can return it.
- if (indexAttr.size() == 1)
- return cast<omp::MapInfoOp>(mapInfo.getMembers()[0].getDefiningOp());
+static void sortMapIndices(llvm::SmallVector<size_t> &indices,
+ mlir::omp::MapInfoOp mapInfo,
+ bool ascending = true) {
+ mlir::ArrayAttr indexAttr = mapInfo.getMembersIndexAttr();
+ if (indexAttr.empty() || indexAttr.size() == 1 || indices.empty() ||
+ indices.size() == 1)
+ return;
- llvm::SmallVector<size_t> indices(indexAttr.size());
- std::iota(indices.begin(), indices.end(), 0);
+ llvm::sort(
+ indices.begin(), indices.end(), [&](const size_t a, const size_t b) {
+ auto memberIndicesA = mlir::cast<mlir::ArrayAttr>(indexAttr[a]);
+ auto memberIndicesB = mlir::cast<mlir::ArrayAttr>(indexAttr[b]);
+
+ size_t smallestMember = memberIndicesA.size() < memberIndicesB.size()
+ ? memberIndicesA.size()
+ : memberIndicesB.size();
- llvm::sort(indices.begin(), indices.end(),
- [&](const size_t a, const size_t b) {
- auto memberIndicesA = cast<ArrayAttr>(indexAttr[a]);
- auto memberIndicesB = cast<ArrayAttr>(indexAttr[b]);
- for (const auto it : llvm::zip(memberIndicesA, memberIndicesB)) {
- int64_t aIndex = cast<IntegerAttr>(std::get<0>(it)).getInt();
- int64_t bIndex = cast<IntegerAttr>(std::get<1>(it)).getInt();
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < smallestMember; ++i) {
+ int64_t aIndex =
+ mlir::cast<mlir::IntegerAttr>(memberIndicesA.getValue()[i])
+ .getInt();
+ int64_t bIndex =
+ mlir::cast<mlir::IntegerAttr>(memberIndicesB.getValue()[i])
+ .getInt();
- if (aIndex == bIndex)
- continue;
+ if (aIndex == bIndex)
+ continue;
- if (aIndex < bIndex)
- return first;
+ if (aIndex < bIndex)
+ return ascending;
- if (aIndex > bIndex)
- return !first;
- }
+ if (aIndex > bIndex)
+ return !ascending;
+ }
- // Iterated the up until the end of the smallest member and
- // they were found to be equal up to that point, so select
- // the member with the lowest index count, so the "parent"
- return memberIndicesA.size() < memberIndicesB.size();
- });
+ // Iterated up until the end of the smallest member and
+ // they were found to be equal up to that point, so select
+ // the member with the lowest index count, so the "parent"
+ return memberIndicesA.size() < memberIndicesB.size();
+ });
+}
+
+static mlir::omp::MapInfoOp
+getFirstOrLastMappedMemberPtr(mlir::omp::MapInfoOp mapInfo, bool first) {
+ mlir::ArrayAttr indexAttr = mapInfo.getMembersIndexAttr();
+ // Only 1 member has been mapped, we can return it.
+ if (indexAttr.size() == 1)
+ if (auto mapOp =
+ dyn_cast<omp::MapInfoOp>(mapInfo.getMembers()[0].getDefiningOp()))
----------------
skatrak wrote:
Let me know if I understood this wrong, but it seems like there is nothing preventing the `llvm::cast` call at the end of this function to trigger an assert if there was a single member mapped that wasn't defined by an `omp.map.info`.
I don't know whether this function can be expected to return `null`, in which case we could replace the `cast` below with a `dyn_cast`, or if this check here should be replaced with `return cast<omp::MapInfoOp>(...)`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119588
More information about the llvm-branch-commits
mailing list