[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] unittests: Use EXPECT_ instead of ASSERT_ in a few tests (PR #129251)

[Matt Arsenault via llvm-branch-commits]

https://github.com/arsenm created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129251

None

>From 47533d045849b72495b51ba7b99913301895cc7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Arsenault <Matthew.Arsenault at amd.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 20:13:23 +0700
Subject: [PATCH] unittests: Use EXPECT_ instead of ASSERT_ in a few tests

---
 llvm/unittests/Support/ProgramTest.cpp | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/llvm/unittests/Support/ProgramTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/Support/ProgramTest.cpp
index b1b35eacd1f61..47d2e269afe94 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/Support/ProgramTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/Support/ProgramTest.cpp
@@ -422,10 +422,10 @@ TEST(ProgramTest, TestExecuteNegative) {
     bool ExecutionFailed;
     int RetCode = ExecuteAndWait(Executable, argv, std::nullopt, {}, 0, 0,
                                  &Error, &ExecutionFailed);
-    ASSERT_LT(RetCode, 0) << "On error ExecuteAndWait should return 0 or "
+    EXPECT_LT(RetCode, 0) << "On error ExecuteAndWait should return 0 or "
                              "positive value indicating the result code";
-    ASSERT_TRUE(ExecutionFailed);
-    ASSERT_FALSE(Error.empty());
+    EXPECT_TRUE(ExecutionFailed);
+    EXPECT_FALSE(Error.empty());
   }
 
   {
@@ -433,10 +433,10 @@ TEST(ProgramTest, TestExecuteNegative) {
     bool ExecutionFailed;
     ProcessInfo PI = ExecuteNoWait(Executable, argv, std::nullopt, {}, 0,
                                    &Error, &ExecutionFailed);
-    ASSERT_EQ(PI.Pid, ProcessInfo::InvalidPid)
+    EXPECT_EQ(PI.Pid, ProcessInfo::InvalidPid)
         << "On error ExecuteNoWait should return an invalid ProcessInfo";
-    ASSERT_TRUE(ExecutionFailed);
-    ASSERT_FALSE(Error.empty());
+    EXPECT_TRUE(ExecutionFailed);
+    EXPECT_FALSE(Error.empty());
   }
 
 }