[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] Remove reference to reverted PR #130742 (PR #152242)

Tobias Hieta via llvm-branch-commits llvm-branch-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Aug 8 03:13:01 PDT 2025


https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152242

>From 6203ddea9f3303fd988724179ec978dc0c54d966 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hubert Tong <hubert.reinterpretcast at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 23:18:17 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Remove reference to reverted PR #130742

Based on the file history in https://github.com/dtcxzyw/llvm-project/commits/main/llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/memcpy-crash-issue63986.ll, it appears #130742 was reverted by #138168 and never re-applied.
---
 clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index 1c6e7fc1c0760..f4f7dd8342d92 100644
--- a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ C/C++ Language Potentially Breaking Changes
   case for old-style offsetof idioms like ``((int)(&(((struct S *)0)->field)))``, to
   ensure they are not caught by these optimizations.  It is also possible to use
   ``-fwrapv-pointer`` or   ``-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks`` to make pointer arithmetic
-  on null pointers well-defined. (#GH130734, #GH130742, #GH130952)
+  on null pointers well-defined. (#GH130734, #GH130952)
 
 C++ Specific Potentially Breaking Changes
 -----------------------------------------



More information about the llvm-branch-commits mailing list