[llvm-branch-commits] [IR] Make BranchInst operand order consistent (PR #151673)

[Nikita Popov via llvm-branch-commits]

nikic wrote:

Ah, I didn't realize that it's always based on op_end.

Maybe this change is not actually that bad if combined with the new successors() representation? Then the successors iterator is not going to through through getSuccessor() anymore and it will have less impact?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151673