[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [ADT] Use range-based helper functions in SmallSet (PR #108585)

David Blaikie via llvm-branch-commits llvm-branch-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Sep 17 11:01:45 PDT 2024


================
@@ -234,19 +225,12 @@ class SmallSet {
   /// Check if the SmallSet contains the given element.
   bool contains(const T &V) const {
     if (isSmall())
-      return vfind(V) != Vector.end();
-    return Set.find(V) != Set.end();
+      return llvm::is_contained(Vector, V);
+    return llvm::is_contained(Set, V);
----------------
dwblaikie wrote:

This advice seems at least inconsistent with the intent of the code per the comment:
```
This is intended as the canonical way to check if an
element exists in a range in generic code or range type that does not
expose a `.contains(Element)` member.
```

In this case, the set meets the second requirement - that it does not expose a `contains` function?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108585


More information about the llvm-branch-commits mailing list