[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [AMDGPU] Fix sign confusion in performMulLoHiCombine (PR #106977)
Tobias Hieta via llvm-branch-commits
llvm-branch-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Sep 12 23:05:05 PDT 2024
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106977
>From 93998aff7662d9b3f94d9627179dffe342e2b399 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jay Foad <jay.foad at amd.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 17:09:40 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [AMDGPU] Fix sign confusion in performMulLoHiCombine
(#105831)
SMUL_LOHI and UMUL_LOHI are different operations because the high part
of the result is different, so it is not OK to optimize the signed
version to MUL_U24/MULHI_U24 or the unsigned version to
MUL_I24/MULHI_I24.
---
llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUISelLowering.cpp | 30 +++---
llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/mul_int24.ll | 98 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUISelLowering.cpp
index 39ae7c96cf7729..a71c9453d968dd 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUISelLowering.cpp
@@ -4349,6 +4349,7 @@ AMDGPUTargetLowering::performMulLoHiCombine(SDNode *N,
SelectionDAG &DAG = DCI.DAG;
SDLoc DL(N);
+ bool Signed = N->getOpcode() == ISD::SMUL_LOHI;
SDValue N0 = N->getOperand(0);
SDValue N1 = N->getOperand(1);
@@ -4363,20 +4364,25 @@ AMDGPUTargetLowering::performMulLoHiCombine(SDNode *N,
// Try to use two fast 24-bit multiplies (one for each half of the result)
// instead of one slow extending multiply.
- unsigned LoOpcode, HiOpcode;
- if (Subtarget->hasMulU24() && isU24(N0, DAG) && isU24(N1, DAG)) {
- N0 = DAG.getZExtOrTrunc(N0, DL, MVT::i32);
- N1 = DAG.getZExtOrTrunc(N1, DL, MVT::i32);
- LoOpcode = AMDGPUISD::MUL_U24;
- HiOpcode = AMDGPUISD::MULHI_U24;
- } else if (Subtarget->hasMulI24() && isI24(N0, DAG) && isI24(N1, DAG)) {
- N0 = DAG.getSExtOrTrunc(N0, DL, MVT::i32);
- N1 = DAG.getSExtOrTrunc(N1, DL, MVT::i32);
- LoOpcode = AMDGPUISD::MUL_I24;
- HiOpcode = AMDGPUISD::MULHI_I24;
+ unsigned LoOpcode = 0;
+ unsigned HiOpcode = 0;
+ if (Signed) {
+ if (Subtarget->hasMulI24() && isI24(N0, DAG) && isI24(N1, DAG)) {
+ N0 = DAG.getSExtOrTrunc(N0, DL, MVT::i32);
+ N1 = DAG.getSExtOrTrunc(N1, DL, MVT::i32);
+ LoOpcode = AMDGPUISD::MUL_I24;
+ HiOpcode = AMDGPUISD::MULHI_I24;
+ }
} else {
- return SDValue();
+ if (Subtarget->hasMulU24() && isU24(N0, DAG) && isU24(N1, DAG)) {
+ N0 = DAG.getZExtOrTrunc(N0, DL, MVT::i32);
+ N1 = DAG.getZExtOrTrunc(N1, DL, MVT::i32);
+ LoOpcode = AMDGPUISD::MUL_U24;
+ HiOpcode = AMDGPUISD::MULHI_U24;
+ }
}
+ if (!LoOpcode)
+ return SDValue();
SDValue Lo = DAG.getNode(LoOpcode, DL, MVT::i32, N0, N1);
SDValue Hi = DAG.getNode(HiOpcode, DL, MVT::i32, N0, N1);
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/mul_int24.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/mul_int24.ll
index be77a10380c49b..8f4c48fae6fb31 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/mul_int24.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/mul_int24.ll
@@ -813,4 +813,102 @@ bb7:
ret void
}
+
+define amdgpu_kernel void @test_umul_i24(ptr addrspace(1) %out, i32 %arg) {
+; SI-LABEL: test_umul_i24:
+; SI: ; %bb.0:
+; SI-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[2:3], 0xb
+; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, 0xff803fe1
+; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s0, 0
+; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s3, 0xf000
+; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
+; SI-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s1, s1, 9
+; SI-NEXT: v_mul_hi_u32 v0, s1, v0
+; SI-NEXT: s_mul_i32 s1, s1, 0xff803fe1
+; SI-NEXT: v_alignbit_b32 v0, v0, s1, 1
+; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, -1
+; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s1, s0
+; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v0, off, s[0:3], 0
+; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
+;
+; VI-LABEL: test_umul_i24:
+; VI: ; %bb.0:
+; VI-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[2:3], 0x2c
+; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, 0xff803fe1
+; VI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s3, 0xf000
+; VI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, -1
+; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
+; VI-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s0, s0, 9
+; VI-NEXT: v_mad_u64_u32 v[0:1], s[0:1], s0, v0, 0
+; VI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s0, 0
+; VI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s1, s0
+; VI-NEXT: v_alignbit_b32 v0, v1, v0, 1
+; VI-NEXT: s_nop 1
+; VI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v0, off, s[0:3], 0
+; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
+;
+; GFX9-LABEL: test_umul_i24:
+; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
+; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[2:3], 0x2c
+; GFX9-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s0, 0
+; GFX9-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s3, 0xf000
+; GFX9-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, -1
+; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
+; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s1, s1, 9
+; GFX9-NEXT: s_mul_hi_u32 s4, s1, 0xff803fe1
+; GFX9-NEXT: s_mul_i32 s1, s1, 0xff803fe1
+; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s1
+; GFX9-NEXT: v_alignbit_b32 v0, s4, v0, 1
+; GFX9-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s1, s0
+; GFX9-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v0, off, s[0:3], 0
+; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
+;
+; EG-LABEL: test_umul_i24:
+; EG: ; %bb.0:
+; EG-NEXT: ALU 8, @4, KC0[CB0:0-32], KC1[]
+; EG-NEXT: MEM_RAT_CACHELESS STORE_RAW T0.X, T1.X, 1
+; EG-NEXT: CF_END
+; EG-NEXT: PAD
+; EG-NEXT: ALU clause starting at 4:
+; EG-NEXT: LSHR * T0.W, KC0[2].Z, literal.x,
+; EG-NEXT: 9(1.261169e-44), 0(0.000000e+00)
+; EG-NEXT: MULHI * T0.X, PV.W, literal.x,
+; EG-NEXT: -8372255(nan), 0(0.000000e+00)
+; EG-NEXT: MULLO_INT * T0.Y, T0.W, literal.x,
+; EG-NEXT: -8372255(nan), 0(0.000000e+00)
+; EG-NEXT: BIT_ALIGN_INT T0.X, T0.X, PS, 1,
+; EG-NEXT: MOV * T1.X, literal.x,
+; EG-NEXT: 0(0.000000e+00), 0(0.000000e+00)
+;
+; CM-LABEL: test_umul_i24:
+; CM: ; %bb.0:
+; CM-NEXT: ALU 14, @4, KC0[CB0:0-32], KC1[]
+; CM-NEXT: MEM_RAT_CACHELESS STORE_DWORD T0.X, T1.X
+; CM-NEXT: CF_END
+; CM-NEXT: PAD
+; CM-NEXT: ALU clause starting at 4:
+; CM-NEXT: LSHR * T0.W, KC0[2].Z, literal.x,
+; CM-NEXT: 9(1.261169e-44), 0(0.000000e+00)
+; CM-NEXT: MULHI T0.X, T0.W, literal.x,
+; CM-NEXT: MULHI T0.Y (MASKED), T0.W, literal.x,
+; CM-NEXT: MULHI T0.Z (MASKED), T0.W, literal.x,
+; CM-NEXT: MULHI * T0.W (MASKED), T0.W, literal.x,
+; CM-NEXT: -8372255(nan), 0(0.000000e+00)
+; CM-NEXT: MULLO_INT T0.X (MASKED), T0.W, literal.x,
+; CM-NEXT: MULLO_INT T0.Y, T0.W, literal.x,
+; CM-NEXT: MULLO_INT T0.Z (MASKED), T0.W, literal.x,
+; CM-NEXT: MULLO_INT * T0.W (MASKED), T0.W, literal.x,
+; CM-NEXT: -8372255(nan), 0(0.000000e+00)
+; CM-NEXT: BIT_ALIGN_INT * T0.X, T0.X, PV.Y, 1,
+; CM-NEXT: MOV * T1.X, literal.x,
+; CM-NEXT: 0(0.000000e+00), 0(0.000000e+00)
+ %i = lshr i32 %arg, 9
+ %i1 = zext i32 %i to i64
+ %i2 = mul i64 %i1, 4286595041
+ %i3 = lshr i64 %i2, 1
+ %i4 = trunc i64 %i3 to i32
+ store i32 %i4, ptr addrspace(1) null, align 4
+ ret void
+}
+
attributes #0 = { nounwind }
More information about the llvm-branch-commits
mailing list