[llvm-branch-commits] [libcxx] release/19.x: [libc++] Fix name of is_always_lock_free test which was never being run (#106077) (PR #110838)

Tobias Hieta via llvm-branch-commits llvm-branch-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Oct 10 22:59:33 PDT 2024


https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110838

>From b0b36c00f50fe88d95fe16b29b0fba501c1fb533 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Louis Dionne <ldionne.2 at gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 08:54:25 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [libc++] Fix name of is_always_lock_free test which was never
 being run (#106077)

(cherry picked from commit b45661953e6974782b0ccada6f0784db04bc693f)
---
 ...s_lock_free.cpp => is_always_lock_free.pass.cpp} | 13 ++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 rename libcxx/test/std/atomics/atomics.lockfree/{is_always_lock_free.cpp => is_always_lock_free.pass.cpp} (94%)

diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/atomics/atomics.lockfree/is_always_lock_free.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/atomics/atomics.lockfree/is_always_lock_free.pass.cpp
similarity index 94%
rename from libcxx/test/std/atomics/atomics.lockfree/is_always_lock_free.cpp
rename to libcxx/test/std/atomics/atomics.lockfree/is_always_lock_free.pass.cpp
index 2dc7f5c7654193..723e7b36f50319 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/atomics/atomics.lockfree/is_always_lock_free.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/atomics/atomics.lockfree/is_always_lock_free.pass.cpp
@@ -5,8 +5,9 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
 //
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-//
+
 // UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11, c++14
+// XFAIL: LIBCXX-PICOLIBC-FIXME
 
 // <atomic>
 //
@@ -15,6 +16,10 @@
 //
 // static constexpr bool is_always_lock_free;
 
+// Ignore diagnostic about vector types changing the ABI on some targets, since
+// that is irrelevant for this test.
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS: -Wno-psabi
+
 #include <atomic>
 #include <cassert>
 #include <cstddef>
@@ -26,7 +31,8 @@ template <typename T>
 void check_always_lock_free(std::atomic<T> const& a) {
   using InfoT = LockFreeStatusInfo<T>;
 
-  constexpr std::same_as<const bool> decltype(auto) is_always_lock_free = std::atomic<T>::is_always_lock_free;
+  constexpr auto is_always_lock_free = std::atomic<T>::is_always_lock_free;
+  ASSERT_SAME_TYPE(decltype(is_always_lock_free), bool const);
 
   // If we know the status of T for sure, validate the exact result of the function.
   if constexpr (InfoT::status_known) {
@@ -44,7 +50,8 @@ void check_always_lock_free(std::atomic<T> const& a) {
 
   // In all cases, also sanity-check it based on the implication always-lock-free => lock-free.
   if (is_always_lock_free) {
-    std::same_as<bool> decltype(auto) is_lock_free = a.is_lock_free();
+    auto is_lock_free = a.is_lock_free();
+    ASSERT_SAME_TYPE(decltype(is_always_lock_free), bool const);
     assert(is_lock_free);
   }
   ASSERT_NOEXCEPT(a.is_lock_free());



More information about the llvm-branch-commits mailing list