[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] release/18.x: [clang-format] Fix a bug in formatting goto labels in macros (#92494) (PR #93494)
via llvm-branch-commits
llvm-branch-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon May 27 17:32:30 PDT 2024
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: None (llvmbot)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
Backport d89f20058b45e3836527e816af7ed7372e1d554d
Requested by: @<!-- -->owenca
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93494.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp (+2-7)
- (modified) clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp (+8)
- (modified) clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp (+13)
``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp b/clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
index f70affb732a0d..179d77bf00491 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
@@ -1185,12 +1185,6 @@ void UnwrappedLineParser::parsePPDefine() {
return;
}
- if (FormatTok->is(tok::identifier) &&
- Tokens->peekNextToken()->is(tok::colon)) {
- nextToken();
- nextToken();
- }
-
// Errors during a preprocessor directive can only affect the layout of the
// preprocessor directive, and thus we ignore them. An alternative approach
// would be to use the same approach we use on the file level (no
@@ -1671,7 +1665,8 @@ void UnwrappedLineParser::parseStructuralElement(
if (!Style.isJavaScript() && !Style.isVerilog() && !Style.isTableGen() &&
Tokens->peekNextToken()->is(tok::colon) && !Line->MustBeDeclaration) {
nextToken();
- Line->Tokens.begin()->Tok->MustBreakBefore = true;
+ if (!Line->InMacroBody || CurrentLines->size() > 1)
+ Line->Tokens.begin()->Tok->MustBreakBefore = true;
FormatTok->setFinalizedType(TT_GotoLabelColon);
parseLabel(!Style.IndentGotoLabels);
if (HasLabel)
diff --git a/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp b/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
index 0161a1685eb12..df730838738d1 100644
--- a/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
+++ b/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
@@ -3118,6 +3118,7 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, FormatsLabels) {
" g();\n"
" }\n"
"}");
+
FormatStyle Style = getLLVMStyle();
Style.IndentGotoLabels = false;
verifyFormat("void f() {\n"
@@ -3157,6 +3158,13 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, FormatsLabels) {
" }\n"
"}",
Style);
+
+ Style.ColumnLimit = 15;
+ verifyFormat("#define FOO \\\n"
+ "label: \\\n"
+ " break;",
+ Style);
+
// The opening brace may either be on the same unwrapped line as the colon or
// on a separate one. The formatter should recognize both.
Style = getLLVMStyle();
diff --git a/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp b/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
index 44ebad9d5a872..dfa9c22430f36 100644
--- a/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
+++ b/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
@@ -2353,15 +2353,28 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, UnderstandsLabels) {
auto Tokens = annotate("{ x: break; }");
ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 7u) << Tokens;
EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[2], tok::colon, TT_GotoLabelColon);
+
Tokens = annotate("{ case x: break; }");
ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 8u) << Tokens;
EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[3], tok::colon, TT_CaseLabelColon);
+
Tokens = annotate("{ x: { break; } }");
ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 9u) << Tokens;
EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[2], tok::colon, TT_GotoLabelColon);
+
Tokens = annotate("{ case x: { break; } }");
ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 10u) << Tokens;
EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[3], tok::colon, TT_CaseLabelColon);
+
+ Tokens = annotate("#define FOO label:");
+ ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 6u) << Tokens;
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::colon, TT_GotoLabelColon);
+
+ Tokens = annotate("#define FOO \\\n"
+ "label: \\\n"
+ " break;");
+ ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 8u) << Tokens;
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::colon, TT_GotoLabelColon);
}
TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, UnderstandsNestedBlocks) {
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93494
More information about the llvm-branch-commits
mailing list