[llvm-branch-commits] [mlir] [mlir][linalg] Decompose winograd operators (PR #96183)

Oleksandr Alex Zinenko via llvm-branch-commits llvm-branch-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jun 24 06:08:20 PDT 2024


================
@@ -48,6 +287,261 @@ Value collapse2DData(RewriterBase &rewriter, Location loc, Value data) {
                                                   reassociation);
 }
 
+// This function transforms the filter. The data layout of the filter is FHWC.
+// The transformation matrix is 2-dimension. We need to extract H x W from
+// FHWC first. We need to generate 2 levels of loops to iterate on F and C.
+// After the transformation, we get
+//
+// scf.for %f = lo_f to hi_f step 1
+//   scf.for %c = lo_c to hi_c step 1
+//     %extracted = extract filter<h x w> from filter<f x h x w x c>
+//     %ret = linalg.matmul G, %extracted
+//     %ret = linalg.matmul %ret, GT
+//     %inserted = insert %ret into filter<tile_h x tile_w x h x w x c x f>
+//
+Value filterTransform(RewriterBase &rewriter, Location loc, Value filter,
+                      Value retValue, int64_t m, int64_t r,
+                      bool leftTransform = true, bool rightTransform = true) {
+  // Map from (m, r) to G transform matrix.
+  static const llvm::SmallDenseMap<TransformMapKeyTy, TransformMatrix>
+      GMatrices = {
+          {F_2_3, TransformMatrix(G_2x2_3x3, 4, 3)},
+          {F_4_3, TransformMatrix(G_4x4_3x3, 6, 3)},
+          {F_2_5, TransformMatrix(G_2x2_5x5, 6, 5)},
+      };
+
+  // Map from (m, r) to GT transform matrix.
+  static const llvm::SmallDenseMap<TransformMapKeyTy, TransformMatrix>
+      GTMatrices = {
+          {F_2_3, TransformMatrix(GT_2x2_3x3, 3, 4)},
+          {F_4_3, TransformMatrix(GT_4x4_3x3, 3, 6)},
+          {F_2_5, TransformMatrix(GT_2x2_5x5, 5, 6)},
+      };
+
+  auto filterType = cast<ShapedType>(filter.getType());
+  Type elementType = filterType.getElementType();
+  auto filterShape = filterType.getShape(); // F, H, W, C
+  int64_t filterF = filterShape[0];
+  int64_t filterH = filterShape[1];
+  int64_t filterW = filterShape[2];
+  int64_t filterC = filterShape[3];
+
+  if (filterH != r && filterH != 1)
+    return Value();
+  if (filterW != r && filterW != 1)
+    return Value();
+
+  // Return shape is <H x W x C x F>
+  auto zeroIdx = rewriter.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 0);
+  auto fUpperBound = rewriter.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, filterF);
+  auto cUpperBound = rewriter.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, filterC);
+  auto oneStep = rewriter.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 1);
+  auto outerForOp =
+      rewriter.create<scf::ForOp>(loc, zeroIdx, fUpperBound, oneStep, retValue);
+  Block *outerForBody = outerForOp.getBody();
+  rewriter.setInsertionPointToStart(outerForBody);
+  Value FIter = outerForBody->getArgument(0);
+
+  auto innerForOp = rewriter.create<scf::ForOp>(
+      loc, zeroIdx, cUpperBound, oneStep, outerForOp.getRegionIterArgs()[0]);
+  Block *innerForBody = innerForOp.getBody();
+  rewriter.setInsertionPointToStart(innerForBody);
+  Value CIter = innerForBody->getArgument(0);
+
+  // Extract (H, W) from (F, H, W, C)
+  auto extractFilter = extract2DData(
+      rewriter, loc, filter, FIter, CIter, /*outLoopIdx=*/0,
+      /*inLoopIdx=*/3, /*heightIdx=*/1, /*widthIdx=*/2, /*srcSize=*/4);
+
+  TransformMapKeyTy key = {m, r};
+  int64_t retRows = 1;
+  Value matmulRetValue = extractFilter;
+  if (leftTransform) {
+    // Get constant transform matrix G
+    auto it = GMatrices.find(key);
+    if (it == GMatrices.end())
+      return Value();
+    const TransformMatrix &GMatrix = it->second;
+
+    retRows = GMatrix.rows;
+    auto matmulType = RankedTensorType::get({retRows, filterW}, elementType);
+    auto init = rewriter.create<tensor::EmptyOp>(loc, matmulType.getShape(),
+                                                 elementType);
+
+    Value G = create2DTransformMatrix(rewriter, loc, GMatrix, elementType);
----------------
ftynse wrote:

I wonder if we rather want to provide these matrices as global memrefs instead of creating locally every time. Have you considered that?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96183


More information about the llvm-branch-commits mailing list