[llvm-branch-commits] [libcxx] Add release note for #95264 (PR #96116)
via llvm-branch-commits
llvm-branch-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jun 19 13:52:05 PDT 2024
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxx
Author: Louis Dionne (ldionne)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96116.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) libcxx/docs/ReleaseNotes/18.rst (+9)
``````````diff
diff --git a/libcxx/docs/ReleaseNotes/18.rst b/libcxx/docs/ReleaseNotes/18.rst
index 7ea13e6943dd4..3e19e7c33f6af 100644
--- a/libcxx/docs/ReleaseNotes/18.rst
+++ b/libcxx/docs/ReleaseNotes/18.rst
@@ -328,6 +328,15 @@ ABI Affecting Changes
done to fix `#70494 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/70494>`_ and the vendor communication is handled
in `#70820 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/70820>`_.
+- LLVM 18.1.8 Fixed an issue that caused ``std::string`` to pass an incorrect size to ``allocator_traits::deallocate``
+ when deallocating memory. The impact is different depending on a few factors:
+ - Users who don't use a custom allocator in ``std::string`` and don't enable sized deallocation (which is
+ off by default in Clang 18) will not be affected. This is expected to be the vast majority of users.
+ - Users who don't use a custom allocator in ``std::string`` but are enabling sized deallocation (e.g. with
+ ``-fsized-deallocation``) will notice that ``operator delete(void*, size_t)`` is now being passed the correct
+ size. This likely has no impact if they were not customizing ``operator delete``.
+ - Users who use a custom allocator in ``std::string`` will notice that they now get passed the correct allocation
+ size upon deallocation.
Build System Changes
--------------------
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96116
More information about the llvm-branch-commits
mailing list