[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [compiler-rt] [ThinLTO][TypeProf] Implement vtable def import (PR #79381)

[via llvm-branch-commits]

================
@@ -1285,46 +1285,44 @@ void annotateValueSite(Module &M, Instruction &Inst,
   Inst.setMetadata(LLVMContext::MD_prof, MDNode::get(Ctx, Vals));
 }
 
-bool getValueProfDataFromInst(const Instruction &Inst,
-                              InstrProfValueKind ValueKind,
-                              uint32_t MaxNumValueData,
-                              InstrProfValueData ValueData[],
-                              uint32_t &ActualNumValueData, uint64_t &TotalC,
-                              bool GetNoICPValue) {
+MDNode *mayHaveValueProfileOfKind(const Instruction &Inst,
+                                  InstrProfValueKind ValueKind) {
   MDNode *MD = Inst.getMetadata(LLVMContext::MD_prof);
   if (!MD)
-    return false;
+    return nullptr;
 
-  unsigned NOps = MD->getNumOperands();
+  if (MD->getNumOperands() < 5)
+    return nullptr;
 
-  if (NOps < 5)
-    return false;
-
-  // Operand 0 is a string tag "VP":
   MDString *Tag = cast<MDString>(MD->getOperand(0));
-  if (!Tag)
-    return false;
-
-  if (!Tag->getString().equals("VP"))
-    return false;
+  if (!Tag || !Tag->getString().equals("VP"))
+    return nullptr;
 
   // Now check kind:
   ConstantInt *KindInt = mdconst::dyn_extract<ConstantInt>(MD->getOperand(1));
   if (!KindInt)
-    return false;
+    return nullptr;
   if (KindInt->getZExtValue() != ValueKind)
-    return false;
+    return nullptr;
+
+  return MD;
+}
 
+static bool getValueProfDataFromInst(const MDNode *const MD,
+                                     const uint32_t MaxNumDataWant,
+                                     InstrProfValueData ValueData[],
+                                     uint32_t &ActualNumValueData,
+                                     uint64_t &TotalC, bool GetNoICPValue) {
+  const unsigned NOps = MD->getNumOperands();
----------------
modiking wrote:

This function should call `mayHaveValueProfileOfKind` so that it remains functionally identical from before this change right?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79381