[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/19.x: [BOLT] Support map other function entry address (#101466) (PR #102282)
via llvm-branch-commits
llvm-branch-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 7 01:02:42 PDT 2024
https://github.com/llvmbot created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102282
Backport 734c048
Requested by: @linsinan1995
>From e362039d6b069b4d7668371f13a94271cb70c52c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: sinan <sinan.lin at linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 15:57:25 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [BOLT] Support map other function entry address (#101466)
Allow BOLT to map the old address to a new binary address if the old
address is the entry of the function.
(cherry picked from commit 734c0488b6e69300adaf568f880f40b113ae02ca)
---
bolt/lib/Rewrite/RewriteInstance.cpp | 8 +++++++
bolt/test/X86/dynamic-relocs-on-entry.s | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 bolt/test/X86/dynamic-relocs-on-entry.s
diff --git a/bolt/lib/Rewrite/RewriteInstance.cpp b/bolt/lib/Rewrite/RewriteInstance.cpp
index 33ebae3b6e6de..2e93b6576edad 100644
--- a/bolt/lib/Rewrite/RewriteInstance.cpp
+++ b/bolt/lib/Rewrite/RewriteInstance.cpp
@@ -5498,6 +5498,14 @@ uint64_t RewriteInstance::getNewFunctionOrDataAddress(uint64_t OldAddress) {
if (const BinaryFunction *BF =
BC->getBinaryFunctionContainingAddress(OldAddress)) {
if (BF->isEmitted()) {
+ // If OldAddress is the another entry point of
+ // the function, then BOLT could get the new address.
+ if (BF->isMultiEntry()) {
+ for (const BinaryBasicBlock &BB : *BF)
+ if (BB.isEntryPoint() &&
+ (BF->getAddress() + BB.getOffset()) == OldAddress)
+ return BF->getOutputAddress() + BB.getOffset();
+ }
BC->errs() << "BOLT-ERROR: unable to get new address corresponding to "
"input address 0x"
<< Twine::utohexstr(OldAddress) << " in function " << *BF
diff --git a/bolt/test/X86/dynamic-relocs-on-entry.s b/bolt/test/X86/dynamic-relocs-on-entry.s
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..2a29a43c4939a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/bolt/test/X86/dynamic-relocs-on-entry.s
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+// This test examines whether BOLT can correctly process when
+// dynamic relocation points to other entry points of the
+// function.
+
+# RUN: %clang %cflags -fPIC -pie %s -o %t.exe -nostdlib -Wl,-q
+# RUN: llvm-bolt %t.exe -o %t.bolt > %t.out.txt
+# RUN: readelf -r %t.bolt >> %t.out.txt
+# RUN: llvm-objdump --disassemble-symbols=chain %t.bolt >> %t.out.txt
+# RUN: FileCheck %s --input-file=%t.out.txt
+
+## Check if the new address in `chain` is correctly updated by BOLT
+# CHECK: Relocation section '.rela.dyn' at offset 0x{{.*}} contains 1 entry:
+# CHECK: {{.*}} R_X86_64_RELATIVE [[#%x,ADDR:]]
+# CHECK: [[#ADDR]]: c3 retq
+ .text
+ .type chain, @function
+chain:
+ movq $1, %rax
+Label:
+ ret
+ .size chain, .-chain
+
+ .type _start, @function
+ .global _start
+_start:
+ jmpq *.Lfoo(%rip)
+ ret
+ .size _start, .-_start
+
+ .data
+.Lfoo:
+ .quad Label
\ No newline at end of file
More information about the llvm-branch-commits
mailing list