[llvm-branch-commits] [lld] dccd061 - [ELF] Suppress "duplicate symbol" when resolving STB_WEAK and STB_GNU_UNIQUE in different COMDATs
Tobias Hieta via llvm-branch-commits
llvm-branch-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Oct 24 04:49:50 PDT 2022
Author: Fangrui Song
Date: 2022-10-24T13:49:35+02:00
New Revision: dccd0613025a6284e2a2296a56099b00a9dadcfe
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dccd0613025a6284e2a2296a56099b00a9dadcfe
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dccd0613025a6284e2a2296a56099b00a9dadcfe.diff
LOG: [ELF] Suppress "duplicate symbol" when resolving STB_WEAK and STB_GNU_UNIQUE in different COMDATs
```
template <typename T> struct A {
A() {}
int value = 0;
};
template <typename Value> struct B {
static A<int> a;
};
template <typename Value> A<int> B<Value>::a;
inline int foo() {
return B<int>::a.value;
}
```
```
clang++ -c -fno-pic a.cc -o weak.o
g++ -c -fno-pic a.cc -o unique.o # --enable-gnu-unique-object
# Duplicate symbol error. In postParse, we do not check `sym.binding`
ld.lld -e 0 weak.o unique.o
```
Mixing GCC and Clang object files in this case is not ideal. .bss._ZGVN1BIiE1aE
has different COMDAT groups. It appears to work in practice because the guard
variable prevents harm due to double initialization.
For the linker, we just stick with the rule that a weak binding does not cause
"duplicate symbol" errors.
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/58232
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136381
(cherry picked from commit 0051b6bb78772b0658f28e5f31ddf91c1589aab5)
Added:
lld/test/ELF/comdat-binding2.s
Modified:
lld/ELF/InputFiles.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/lld/ELF/InputFiles.cpp b/lld/ELF/InputFiles.cpp
index 927dc272b5326..473809b05e9c2 100644
--- a/lld/ELF/InputFiles.cpp
+++ b/lld/ELF/InputFiles.cpp
@@ -1157,7 +1157,7 @@ template <class ELFT> void ObjFile<ELFT>::postParse() {
continue;
}
- if (binding == STB_WEAK)
+ if (sym.binding == STB_WEAK || binding == STB_WEAK)
continue;
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(mu);
ctx->duplicates.push_back({&sym, this, sec, eSym.st_value});
diff --git a/lld/test/ELF/comdat-binding2.s b/lld/test/ELF/comdat-binding2.s
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..3ffd7252836c9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lld/test/ELF/comdat-binding2.s
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+# REQUIRES: x86
+## Test we don't report duplicate definition errors when mixing Clang STB_WEAK
+## and GCC STB_GNU_UNIQUE symbols.
+
+# RUN: rm -rf %t && split-file %s %t && cd %t
+# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=x86_64 weak.s -o weak.o
+# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=x86_64 unique.s -o unique.o
+# RUN: ld.lld weak.o unique.o -o weak
+# RUN: llvm-readelf -s weak | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=WEAK
+# RUN: ld.lld unique.o weak.o -o unique
+# RUN: llvm-readelf -s unique | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=UNIQUE
+
+# WEAK: OBJECT WEAK DEFAULT [[#]] _ZN1BIiE1aE
+# UNIQUE: OBJECT UNIQUE DEFAULT [[#]] _ZN1BIiE1aE
+
+#--- weak.s
+## Clang
+ .type _ZN1BIiE1aE, at object
+ .section .bss._ZN1BIiE1aE,"aGwR", at nobits,_ZN1BIiE1aE,comdat
+ .weak _ZN1BIiE1aE
+_ZN1BIiE1aE:
+ .zero 4
+
+ .type _ZGVN1BIiE1aE, at object
+ .section .bss._ZGVN1BIiE1aE,"aGw", at nobits,_ZN1BIiE1aE,comdat
+ .weak _ZGVN1BIiE1aE
+_ZGVN1BIiE1aE:
+ .quad 0
+
+#--- unique.s
+## GCC -fgnu-unique. Note the
diff erent group signature for the second group.
+ .weak _ZN1BIiE1aE
+ .section .bss._ZN1BIiE1aE,"awG", at nobits,_ZN1BIiE1aE,comdat
+ .type _ZN1BIiE1aE, @gnu_unique_object
+_ZN1BIiE1aE:
+ .zero 4
+
+ .weak _ZGVN1BIiE1aE
+ .section .bss._ZGVN1BIiE1aE,"awG", at nobits,_ZGVN1BIiE1aE,comdat
+ .type _ZGVN1BIiE1aE, @gnu_unique_object
+_ZGVN1BIiE1aE:
+ .zero 8
More information about the llvm-branch-commits
mailing list