[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] e294ece - BPF: fix enum value 0 issue for __builtin_preserve_enum_value()
Tom Stellard via llvm-branch-commits
llvm-branch-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon May 3 17:45:32 PDT 2021
Author: Yonghong Song
Date: 2021-05-03T17:45:16-07:00
New Revision: e294ece42d85191875782ed05cb607451f493944
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e294ece42d85191875782ed05cb607451f493944
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e294ece42d85191875782ed05cb607451f493944.diff
LOG: BPF: fix enum value 0 issue for __builtin_preserve_enum_value()
Lorenz Bauer reported that the following code will have
compilation error for bpf target:
enum e { TWO };
bpf_core_enum_value_exists(enum e, TWO);
The clang emitted the following error message:
__builtin_preserve_enum_value argument 1 invalid
In SemaChecking, an expression like "*(enum NAME)1" will have
cast kind CK_IntegralToPointer, but "*(enum NAME)0" will have
cast kind CK_NullToPointer. Current implementation only permits
CK_IntegralToPointer, missing enum value 0 case.
This patch permits CK_NullToPointer cast kind and
the above test case can pass now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97659
(cherry picked from commit 283db5f0837d55f91242812003adf6e189ba743e)
Added:
Modified:
clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
clang/test/CodeGen/builtins-bpf-preserve-field-info-4.c
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
index 2d3d36f4adad0..2b55712d44c27 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
@@ -2623,7 +2623,10 @@ static bool isValidBPFPreserveEnumValueArg(Expr *Arg) {
return false;
const auto *CE = dyn_cast<CStyleCastExpr>(UO->getSubExpr());
- if (!CE || CE->getCastKind() != CK_IntegralToPointer)
+ if (!CE)
+ return false;
+ if (CE->getCastKind() != CK_IntegralToPointer &&
+ CE->getCastKind() != CK_NullToPointer)
return false;
// The integer must be from an EnumConstantDecl.
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGen/builtins-bpf-preserve-field-info-4.c b/clang/test/CodeGen/builtins-bpf-preserve-field-info-4.c
index e07c680bb3702..b167b776e385e 100644
--- a/clang/test/CodeGen/builtins-bpf-preserve-field-info-4.c
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGen/builtins-bpf-preserve-field-info-4.c
@@ -4,10 +4,11 @@
#define _(x, y) (__builtin_preserve_enum_value((x), (y)))
enum AA {
+ VAL0 = 0,
VAL1 = 2,
VAL2 = 0xffffffff80000000UL,
};
-typedef enum { VAL10 = -2, VAL11 = 0xffff8000, } __BB;
+typedef enum { VAL00, VAL10 = -2, VAL11 = 0xffff8000, } __BB;
unsigned unit1() {
return _(*(enum AA *)VAL1, 0) + _(*(__BB *)VAL10, 1);
@@ -17,10 +18,16 @@ unsigned unit2() {
return _(*(enum AA *)VAL2, 0) + _(*(__BB *)VAL11, 1);
}
+unsigned unit3() {
+ return _(*(enum AA *)VAL0, 0) + _(*(__BB *)VAL00, 1);
+}
+
// CHECK: @0 = private unnamed_addr constant [7 x i8] c"VAL1:2\00", align 1
// CHECK: @1 = private unnamed_addr constant [9 x i8] c"VAL10:-2\00", align 1
// CHECK: @2 = private unnamed_addr constant [17 x i8] c"VAL2:-2147483648\00", align 1
// CHECK: @3 = private unnamed_addr constant [17 x i8] c"VAL11:4294934528\00", align 1
+// CHECK: @4 = private unnamed_addr constant [7 x i8] c"VAL0:0\00", align 1
+// CHECK: @5 = private unnamed_addr constant [8 x i8] c"VAL00:0\00", align 1
// CHECK: call i64 @llvm.bpf.preserve.enum.value(i32 0, i8* getelementptr inbounds ([7 x i8], [7 x i8]* @0, i32 0, i32 0), i64 0), !dbg !{{[0-9]+}}, !llvm.preserve.access.index ![[ENUM_AA:[0-9]+]]
// CHECK: call i64 @llvm.bpf.preserve.enum.value(i32 1, i8* getelementptr inbounds ([9 x i8], [9 x i8]* @1, i32 0, i32 0), i64 1), !dbg !{{[0-9]+}}, !llvm.preserve.access.index ![[TYPEDEF_ENUM:[0-9]+]]
@@ -28,5 +35,8 @@ unsigned unit2() {
// CHECK: call i64 @llvm.bpf.preserve.enum.value(i32 2, i8* getelementptr inbounds ([17 x i8], [17 x i8]* @2, i32 0, i32 0), i64 0), !dbg !{{[0-9]+}}, !llvm.preserve.access.index ![[ENUM_AA]]
// CHECK: call i64 @llvm.bpf.preserve.enum.value(i32 3, i8* getelementptr inbounds ([17 x i8], [17 x i8]* @3, i32 0, i32 0), i64 1), !dbg !{{[0-9]+}}, !llvm.preserve.access.index ![[TYPEDEF_ENUM]]
+// CHECK: call i64 @llvm.bpf.preserve.enum.value(i32 4, i8* getelementptr inbounds ([7 x i8], [7 x i8]* @4, i32 0, i32 0), i64 0), !dbg !{{[0-9]+}}, !llvm.preserve.access.index ![[ENUM_AA]]
+// CHECK: call i64 @llvm.bpf.preserve.enum.value(i32 5, i8* getelementptr inbounds ([8 x i8], [8 x i8]* @5, i32 0, i32 0), i64 1), !dbg !{{[0-9]+}}, !llvm.preserve.access.index ![[TYPEDEF_ENUM]]
+
// CHECK: ![[ENUM_AA]] = !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_enumeration_type, name: "AA"
// CHECK: ![[TYPEDEF_ENUM]] = !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_typedef, name: "__BB"
More information about the llvm-branch-commits
mailing list