[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] 0530e2a - [Syntax] Merge overlapping top-level macros in TokenBuffer
Haojian Wu via llvm-branch-commits
llvm-branch-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jun 10 05:22:19 PDT 2020
Author: Sam McCall
Date: 2020-06-10T14:21:44+02:00
New Revision: 0530e2a811b08f13e8137c29f047ad6bd11967fa
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0530e2a811b08f13e8137c29f047ad6bd11967fa
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0530e2a811b08f13e8137c29f047ad6bd11967fa.diff
LOG: [Syntax] Merge overlapping top-level macros in TokenBuffer
Summary:
Our previous definition of "top-level" was too informal, and didn't
allow for overlapping macros that each directly produce expanded tokens.
See D77507 for previous discussion.
Fixes http://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45428
Reviewers: kadircet, vabridgers
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77615
(cherry picked from commit d66afd6dde542dc373f87e07fe764c071fe20d76)
Added:
Modified:
clang/lib/Tooling/Syntax/Tokens.cpp
clang/unittests/Tooling/Syntax/TokensTest.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/clang/lib/Tooling/Syntax/Tokens.cpp b/clang/lib/Tooling/Syntax/Tokens.cpp
index 77cc9295757b..35a35f904069 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Tooling/Syntax/Tokens.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Tooling/Syntax/Tokens.cpp
@@ -335,14 +335,38 @@ class TokenCollector::CollectPPExpansions : public PPCallbacks {
SourceRange Range, const MacroArgs *Args) override {
if (!Collector)
return;
- // Only record top-level expansions, not those where:
+ const auto &SM = Collector->PP.getSourceManager();
+ // Only record top-level expansions that directly produce expanded tokens.
+ // This excludes those where:
// - the macro use is inside a macro body,
// - the macro appears in an argument to another macro.
- if (!MacroNameTok.getLocation().isFileID() ||
- (LastExpansionEnd.isValid() &&
- Collector->PP.getSourceManager().isBeforeInTranslationUnit(
- Range.getBegin(), LastExpansionEnd)))
+ // However macro expansion isn't really a tree, it's token rewrite rules,
+ // so there are other cases, e.g.
+ // #define B(X) X
+ // #define A 1 + B
+ // A(2)
+ // Both A and B produce expanded tokens, though the macro name 'B' comes
+ // from an expansion. The best we can do is merge the mappings for both.
+
+ // The *last* token of any top-level macro expansion must be in a file.
+ // (In the example above, see the closing paren of the expansion of B).
+ if (!Range.getEnd().isFileID())
return;
+ // If there's a current expansion that encloses this one, this one can't be
+ // top-level.
+ if (LastExpansionEnd.isValid() &&
+ !SM.isBeforeInTranslationUnit(LastExpansionEnd, Range.getEnd()))
+ return;
+
+ // If the macro invocation (B) starts in a macro (A) but ends in a file,
+ // we'll create a merged mapping for A + B by overwriting the endpoint for
+ // A's startpoint.
+ if (!Range.getBegin().isFileID()) {
+ Range.setBegin(SM.getExpansionLoc(Range.getBegin()));
+ assert(Collector->Expansions.count(Range.getBegin().getRawEncoding()) &&
+ "Overlapping macros should have same expansion location");
+ }
+
Collector->Expansions[Range.getBegin().getRawEncoding()] = Range.getEnd();
LastExpansionEnd = Range.getEnd();
}
diff --git a/clang/unittests/Tooling/Syntax/TokensTest.cpp b/clang/unittests/Tooling/Syntax/TokensTest.cpp
index b2ad3859104a..f1e2dda963cb 100644
--- a/clang/unittests/Tooling/Syntax/TokensTest.cpp
+++ b/clang/unittests/Tooling/Syntax/TokensTest.cpp
@@ -470,11 +470,28 @@ file './input.cpp'
mappings:
['#'_0, 'int'_7) => ['int'_0, 'int'_0)
['FOO'_10, '<eof>'_11) => ['10'_3, '<eof>'_7)
-)"}};
+)"},
+ {R"cpp(
+ #define NUM 42
+ #define ID(a) a
+ #define M 1 + ID
+ M(NUM)
+ )cpp",
+ R"(expanded tokens:
+ 1 + 42
+file './input.cpp'
+ spelled tokens:
+ # define NUM 42 # define ID ( a ) a # define M 1 + ID M ( NUM )
+ mappings:
+ ['#'_0, 'M'_17) => ['1'_0, '1'_0)
+ ['M'_17, '<eof>'_21) => ['1'_0, '<eof>'_3)
+)"},
+ };
- for (auto &Test : TestCases)
- EXPECT_EQ(Test.second, collectAndDump(Test.first))
- << collectAndDump(Test.first);
+ for (auto &Test : TestCases) {
+ std::string Dump = collectAndDump(Test.first);
+ EXPECT_EQ(Test.second, Dump) << Dump;
+ }
}
TEST_F(TokenCollectorTest, SpecialTokens) {
More information about the llvm-branch-commits
mailing list