[llvm-branch-commits] [lldb] 7751f0c - Add testing for DW_OP_piece and fix a bug with small Scalar values.
Hans Wennborg via llvm-branch-commits
llvm-branch-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Feb 19 05:21:25 PST 2020
Author: Adrian Prantl
Date: 2020-02-19T14:20:33+01:00
New Revision: 7751f0c191518b377d9b71bdd17281abec83945a
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7751f0c191518b377d9b71bdd17281abec83945a
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7751f0c191518b377d9b71bdd17281abec83945a.diff
LOG: Add testing for DW_OP_piece and fix a bug with small Scalar values.
By switching to Scalars that are backed by explicitly-sized APInts we
can avoid a bug that increases the buffer reserved for a small piece
to the next-largest host integer type.
This manifests as "DW_OP_piece for offset foo but top of stack is of size bar".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72879
(cherry picked from commit 7b0d58e339b271e3b1d9dc14b781b57fa0262e3a)
Added:
Modified:
lldb/source/Expression/DWARFExpression.cpp
lldb/unittests/Expression/DWARFExpressionTest.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/lldb/source/Expression/DWARFExpression.cpp b/lldb/source/Expression/DWARFExpression.cpp
index 69c84640ef93..0f8eea754c24 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Expression/DWARFExpression.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Expression/DWARFExpression.cpp
@@ -2128,7 +2128,8 @@ bool DWARFExpression::Evaluate(
case Value::eValueTypeScalar: {
uint32_t bit_size = piece_byte_size * 8;
uint32_t bit_offset = 0;
- if (!curr_piece_source_value.GetScalar().ExtractBitfield(
+ Scalar &scalar = curr_piece_source_value.GetScalar();
+ if (!scalar.ExtractBitfield(
bit_size, bit_offset)) {
if (error_ptr)
error_ptr->SetErrorStringWithFormat(
@@ -2139,7 +2140,14 @@ bool DWARFExpression::Evaluate(
.GetByteSize());
return false;
}
- curr_piece = curr_piece_source_value;
+ // Create curr_piece with bit_size. By default Scalar
+ // grows to the nearest host integer type.
+ llvm::APInt fail_value(1, 0, false);
+ llvm::APInt ap_int = scalar.UInt128(fail_value);
+ assert(ap_int.getBitWidth() >= bit_size);
+ llvm::ArrayRef<uint64_t> buf{ap_int.getRawData(),
+ ap_int.getNumWords()};
+ curr_piece.GetScalar() = Scalar(llvm::APInt(bit_size, buf));
} break;
case Value::eValueTypeVector: {
@@ -2161,7 +2169,7 @@ bool DWARFExpression::Evaluate(
if (op_piece_offset == 0) {
// This is the first piece, we should push it back onto the stack
// so subsequent pieces will be able to access this piece and add
- // to it
+ // to it.
if (pieces.AppendDataToHostBuffer(curr_piece) == 0) {
if (error_ptr)
error_ptr->SetErrorString("failed to append piece data");
@@ -2169,7 +2177,7 @@ bool DWARFExpression::Evaluate(
}
} else {
// If this is the second or later piece there should be a value on
- // the stack
+ // the stack.
if (pieces.GetBuffer().GetByteSize() != op_piece_offset) {
if (error_ptr)
error_ptr->SetErrorStringWithFormat(
diff --git a/lldb/unittests/Expression/DWARFExpressionTest.cpp b/lldb/unittests/Expression/DWARFExpressionTest.cpp
index 8fad88a93e11..fe5e9c957ba0 100644
--- a/lldb/unittests/Expression/DWARFExpressionTest.cpp
+++ b/lldb/unittests/Expression/DWARFExpressionTest.cpp
@@ -37,7 +37,22 @@ static llvm::Expected<Scalar> Evaluate(llvm::ArrayRef<uint8_t> expr,
/*object_address_ptr*/ nullptr, result, &status))
return status.ToError();
- return result.GetScalar();
+ switch (result.GetValueType()) {
+ case Value::eValueTypeScalar:
+ return result.GetScalar();
+ case Value::eValueTypeHostAddress: {
+ // Convert small buffers to scalars to simplify the tests.
+ DataBufferHeap &buf = result.GetBuffer();
+ if (buf.GetByteSize() <= 8) {
+ uint64_t val = 0;
+ memcpy(&val, buf.GetBytes(), buf.GetByteSize());
+ return Scalar(llvm::APInt(buf.GetByteSize()*8, val, false));
+ }
+ }
+ LLVM_FALLTHROUGH;
+ default:
+ return status.ToError();
+ }
}
/// A mock module holding an object file parsed from YAML.
@@ -335,3 +350,9 @@ TEST(DWARFExpression, DW_OP_convert) {
t.Eval({DW_OP_const1s, 'X', DW_OP_convert, 0x1d}).takeError(),
llvm::Failed());
}
+
+TEST(DWARFExpression, DW_OP_piece) {
+ EXPECT_THAT_EXPECTED(Evaluate({DW_OP_const2u, 0x11, 0x22, DW_OP_piece, 2,
+ DW_OP_const2u, 0x33, 0x44, DW_OP_piece, 2}),
+ llvm::HasValue(GetScalar(32, 0x44332211, true)));
+}
More information about the llvm-branch-commits
mailing list