[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] 96ed02d - [Concepts] Fix incorrect check when instantiating abbreviated template type-constraints
Saar Raz via llvm-branch-commits
llvm-branch-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Feb 6 13:31:42 PST 2020
Author: Saar Raz
Date: 2020-02-06T23:30:34+02:00
New Revision: 96ed02ddeebfd18265ef687fce80e7e148ec261c
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/96ed02ddeebfd18265ef687fce80e7e148ec261c
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/96ed02ddeebfd18265ef687fce80e7e148ec261c.diff
LOG: [Concepts] Fix incorrect check when instantiating abbreviated template type-constraints
We would incorrectly check whether the type-constraint had already been initialized, causing us
to ignore the invented template type constraints entirely.
Also, TemplateParameterList would store incorrect information about invented type parameters
when it observed them before their type-constraint was initialized, so we recreate it after
initializing the function type of an abbreviated template.
(cherry picked from commit 38fd69995fc5a6f16e0aa132a46e5ccdbc2eebb3)
Added:
Modified:
clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp
clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp
clang/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-abbreviated-template.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp
index a9357ede700e..568f5404dc0b 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp
@@ -2290,12 +2290,12 @@ ParmVarDecl *Sema::SubstParmVarDecl(ParmVarDecl *OldParm,
if (TemplateTypeParmDecl *TTP =
GetContainedInventedTypeParmVisitor().Visit(OldDI->getType())) {
if (const TypeConstraint *TC = TTP->getTypeConstraint()) {
- auto *Inst = cast<TemplateTypeParmDecl>(
+ auto *Inst = cast_or_null<TemplateTypeParmDecl>(
FindInstantiatedDecl(TTP->getLocation(), TTP, TemplateArgs));
// We will first get here when instantiating the abbreviated function
// template's described function, but we might also get here later.
// Make sure we do not instantiate the TypeConstraint more than once.
- if (Inst && !Inst->hasTypeConstraint()) {
+ if (Inst && !Inst->getTypeConstraint()) {
// TODO: Concepts: do not instantiate the constraint (delayed constraint
// substitution)
const ASTTemplateArgumentListInfo *TemplArgInfo
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp
index 7094462e74c9..37dace3bee7f 100755
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp
@@ -1837,6 +1837,23 @@ Decl *TemplateDeclInstantiator::VisitFunctionDecl(
return nullptr;
QualType T = adjustFunctionTypeForInstantiation(SemaRef.Context, D, TInfo);
+ if (TemplateParams && TemplateParams->size()) {
+ auto *LastParam =
+ dyn_cast<TemplateTypeParmDecl>(TemplateParams->asArray().back());
+ if (LastParam && LastParam->isImplicit() &&
+ LastParam->hasTypeConstraint()) {
+ // In abbreviated templates, the type-constraints of invented template
+ // type parameters are instantiated with the function type, invalidating
+ // the TemplateParameterList which relied on the template type parameter
+ // not having a type constraint. Recreate the TemplateParameterList with
+ // the updated parameter list.
+ TemplateParams = TemplateParameterList::Create(
+ SemaRef.Context, TemplateParams->getTemplateLoc(),
+ TemplateParams->getLAngleLoc(), TemplateParams->asArray(),
+ TemplateParams->getRAngleLoc(), TemplateParams->getRequiresClause());
+ }
+ }
+
NestedNameSpecifierLoc QualifierLoc = D->getQualifierLoc();
if (QualifierLoc) {
QualifierLoc = SemaRef.SubstNestedNameSpecifierLoc(QualifierLoc,
@@ -2177,6 +2194,23 @@ Decl *TemplateDeclInstantiator::VisitCXXMethodDecl(
return nullptr;
QualType T = adjustFunctionTypeForInstantiation(SemaRef.Context, D, TInfo);
+ if (TemplateParams && TemplateParams->size()) {
+ auto *LastParam =
+ dyn_cast<TemplateTypeParmDecl>(TemplateParams->asArray().back());
+ if (LastParam && LastParam->isImplicit() &&
+ LastParam->hasTypeConstraint()) {
+ // In abbreviated templates, the type-constraints of invented template
+ // type parameters are instantiated with the function type, invalidating
+ // the TemplateParameterList which relied on the template type parameter
+ // not having a type constraint. Recreate the TemplateParameterList with
+ // the updated parameter list.
+ TemplateParams = TemplateParameterList::Create(
+ SemaRef.Context, TemplateParams->getTemplateLoc(),
+ TemplateParams->getLAngleLoc(), TemplateParams->asArray(),
+ TemplateParams->getRAngleLoc(), TemplateParams->getRequiresClause());
+ }
+ }
+
NestedNameSpecifierLoc QualifierLoc = D->getQualifierLoc();
if (QualifierLoc) {
QualifierLoc = SemaRef.SubstNestedNameSpecifierLoc(QualifierLoc,
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-abbreviated-template.cpp b/clang/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-abbreviated-template.cpp
index a73b6ce3610f..99801115626f 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-abbreviated-template.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-abbreviated-template.cpp
@@ -1,29 +1,33 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2a -x c++ %s -verify
-// expected-no-diagnostics
template<typename...>
-concept C = true;
+concept C = false; // expected-note 9{{because}}
template<typename T>
struct S {
template<typename U>
static void foo1(U a, auto b);
static void foo2(T a, C<T> auto b);
+ // expected-note at -1{{candidate template ignored}} expected-note at -1{{because}}
static void foo3(T a, C<decltype(a)> auto b);
+ // expected-note at -1{{candidate template ignored}} expected-note at -1{{because}}
static void foo4(T a, C<decltype(a)> auto b, const C<decltype(b)> auto &&c);
+ // expected-note at -1{{candidate template ignored}} expected-note at -1{{because}}
};
using sf1 = decltype(S<int>::foo1(1, 2));
-using sf2 = decltype(S<int>::foo2(1, 2));
-using sf3 = decltype(S<int>::foo3(1, 2));
-using sf4 = decltype(S<int>::foo4(1, 2, 3));
+using sf2 = decltype(S<int>::foo2(1, 2)); // expected-error{{no matching function}}
+using sf3 = decltype(S<int>::foo3(1, 2)); // expected-error{{no matching function}}
+using sf4 = decltype(S<int>::foo4(1, 2, 3)); // expected-error{{no matching function}}
template<typename... T>
struct G {
static void foo1(auto a, const C<decltype(a)> auto &&... b);
+ // expected-note at -1{{candidate template ignored}} expected-note at -1{{because}} expected-note at -1 3{{and}}
static void foo2(auto a, const C<decltype(a), T> auto &&... b);
+ // expected-note at -1{{candidate template ignored}} expected-note at -1{{because}} expected-note at -1{{and}}
};
-using gf1 = decltype(G<int, char>::foo1('a', 1, 2, 3, 4));
-using gf2 = decltype(G<int, char>::foo2('a', 1, 2));
+using gf1 = decltype(G<int, char>::foo1('a', 1, 2, 3, 4)); // expected-error{{no matching function}}
+using gf2 = decltype(G<int, char>::foo2('a', 1, 2)); // expected-error{{no matching function}}
More information about the llvm-branch-commits
mailing list