[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] 0503926 - [IRSim] Adding support for isomorphic predicates
Andrew Litteken via llvm-branch-commits
llvm-branch-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Dec 23 13:06:09 PST 2020
Author: Andrew Litteken
Date: 2020-12-23T15:02:00-06:00
New Revision: 050392660249c70c00e909ae4a7151ba2c766235
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/050392660249c70c00e909ae4a7151ba2c766235
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/050392660249c70c00e909ae4a7151ba2c766235.diff
LOG: [IRSim] Adding support for isomorphic predicates
Some predicates, can be considered the same as long as the operands are
flipped. For example, a > b gives the same result as b > a. This maps
instructions in a greater than form, to their appropriate less than
form, swapping the operands in the IRInstructionData only, allowing for
more flexible matching.
Tests:
llvm/test/Transforms/IROutliner/outlining-isomorphic-predicates.ll
llvm/unittests/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifierTest.cpp
Reviewers: jroelofs, paquette
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87310
Added:
llvm/test/Transforms/IROutliner/outlining-isomorphic-predicates.ll
Modified:
llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifier.h
llvm/lib/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifier.cpp
llvm/unittests/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifierTest.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifier.h b/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifier.h
index 4bc5a17b57e5..99a5fcb3a578 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifier.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifier.h
@@ -122,6 +122,11 @@ struct IRInstructionData : ilist_node<IRInstructionData> {
/// considered similar.
bool Legal;
+ /// This is only relevant if we are wrapping a CmpInst where we needed to
+ /// change the predicate of a compare instruction from a greater than form
+ /// to a less than form. It is None otherwise.
+ Optional<CmpInst::Predicate> RevisedPredicate;
+
/// Gather the information that is
diff icult to gather for an Instruction, or
/// is changed. i.e. the operands of an Instruction and the Types of those
/// operands. This extra information allows for similarity matching to make
@@ -129,6 +134,17 @@ struct IRInstructionData : ilist_node<IRInstructionData> {
/// Instruction performs the same operation.
IRInstructionData(Instruction &I, bool Legality, IRInstructionDataList &IDL);
+ /// Get the predicate that the compare instruction is using for hashing the
+ /// instruction. the IRInstructionData must be wrapping a CmpInst.
+ CmpInst::Predicate getPredicate() const;
+
+ /// A function that swaps the predicates to their less than form if they are
+ /// in a greater than form. Otherwise, the predicate is unchanged.
+ ///
+ /// \param CI - The comparison operation to find a consistent preidcate for.
+ /// \return the consistent comparison predicate.
+ static CmpInst::Predicate predicateForConsistency(CmpInst *CI);
+
/// Hashes \p Value based on its opcode, types, and operand types.
/// Two IRInstructionData instances produce the same hash when they perform
/// the same operation.
@@ -161,6 +177,12 @@ struct IRInstructionData : ilist_node<IRInstructionData> {
for (Value *V : ID.OperVals)
OperTypes.push_back(V->getType());
+ if (isa<CmpInst>(ID.Inst))
+ return llvm::hash_combine(
+ llvm::hash_value(ID.Inst->getOpcode()),
+ llvm::hash_value(ID.Inst->getType()),
+ llvm::hash_value(ID.getPredicate()),
+ llvm::hash_combine_range(OperTypes.begin(), OperTypes.end()));
return llvm::hash_combine(
llvm::hash_value(ID.Inst->getOpcode()),
llvm::hash_value(ID.Inst->getType()),
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifier.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifier.cpp
index 28b0382bba36..4ee152450c05 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifier.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifier.cpp
@@ -26,15 +26,84 @@ using namespace IRSimilarity;
IRInstructionData::IRInstructionData(Instruction &I, bool Legality,
IRInstructionDataList &IDList)
: Inst(&I), Legal(Legality), IDL(&IDList) {
- // Here we collect the operands to be used to determine whether two
- // instructions are similar to one another.
- for (Use &OI : I.operands())
+ // We check for whether we have a comparison instruction. If it is, we
+ // find the "less than" version of the predicate for consistency for
+ // comparison instructions throught the program.
+ if (CmpInst *C = dyn_cast<CmpInst>(&I)) {
+ CmpInst::Predicate Predicate = predicateForConsistency(C);
+ if (Predicate != C->getPredicate())
+ RevisedPredicate = Predicate;
+ }
+
+ // Here we collect the operands and their types for determining whether
+ // the structure of the operand use matches between two
diff erent candidates.
+ for (Use &OI : I.operands()) {
+ if (isa<CmpInst>(I) && RevisedPredicate.hasValue()) {
+ // If we have a CmpInst where the predicate is reversed, it means the
+ // operands must be reversed as well.
+ OperVals.insert(OperVals.begin(), OI.get());
+ continue;
+ }
+
OperVals.push_back(OI.get());
+ }
+}
+
+CmpInst::Predicate IRInstructionData::predicateForConsistency(CmpInst *CI) {
+ switch (CI->getPredicate()) {
+ case CmpInst::FCMP_OGT:
+ case CmpInst::FCMP_UGT:
+ case CmpInst::FCMP_OGE:
+ case CmpInst::FCMP_UGE:
+ case CmpInst::ICMP_SGT:
+ case CmpInst::ICMP_UGT:
+ case CmpInst::ICMP_SGE:
+ case CmpInst::ICMP_UGE:
+ return CI->getSwappedPredicate();
+ default:
+ return CI->getPredicate();
+ }
+}
+
+CmpInst::Predicate IRInstructionData::getPredicate() const {
+ assert(isa<CmpInst>(Inst) &&
+ "Can only get a predicate from a compare instruction");
+
+ if (RevisedPredicate.hasValue())
+ return RevisedPredicate.getValue();
+
+ return cast<CmpInst>(Inst)->getPredicate();
}
bool IRSimilarity::isClose(const IRInstructionData &A,
const IRInstructionData &B) {
- return A.Legal && A.Inst->isSameOperationAs(B.Inst);
+
+ if (!A.Legal || !B.Legal)
+ return false;
+
+ // Check if we are performing the same sort of operation on the same types
+ // but not on the same values.
+ if (A.Inst->isSameOperationAs(B.Inst))
+ return true;
+
+ // If there is a predicate, this means that either there is a swapped
+ // predicate, or that the types are
diff erent, we want to make sure that
+ // the predicates are equivalent via swapping.
+ if (isa<CmpInst>(A.Inst) && isa<CmpInst>(B.Inst)) {
+
+ if (A.getPredicate() != B.getPredicate())
+ return false;
+
+ // If the predicates are the same via swap, make sure that the types are
+ // still the same.
+ auto ZippedTypes = zip(A.OperVals, B.OperVals);
+
+ return all_of(ZippedTypes, [](std::tuple<llvm::Value *, llvm::Value *> R) {
+ return std::get<0>(R)->getType() == std::get<1>(R)->getType();
+ });
+ }
+
+ return false;
}
// TODO: This is the same as the MachineOutliner, and should be consolidated
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/IROutliner/outlining-isomorphic-predicates.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/IROutliner/outlining-isomorphic-predicates.ll
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..16233beff87c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/IROutliner/outlining-isomorphic-predicates.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
+; RUN: opt -S -verify -iroutliner < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+; This test checks the isomorphic comparisons can be outlined together into one
+; function.
+
+; The following three function are identical, except that in the third, the
+; operand order, and predicate are swapped, meaning it is structurally the same
+; and should be outlined together.
+
+define void @outline_slt1() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @outline_slt1(
+; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*]] = alloca i32, align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[B:%.*]] = alloca i32, align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: call void @outlined_ir_func_1(i32* [[A]], i32* [[B]])
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
+;
+entry:
+ %a = alloca i32, align 4
+ %b = alloca i32, align 4
+ store i32 2, i32* %a, align 4
+ store i32 3, i32* %b, align 4
+ %al = load i32, i32* %a
+ %bl = load i32, i32* %b
+ %0 = icmp slt i32 %al, %bl
+ ret void
+}
+
+define void @outline_slt2() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @outline_slt2(
+; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*]] = alloca i32, align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[B:%.*]] = alloca i32, align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: call void @outlined_ir_func_1(i32* [[A]], i32* [[B]])
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
+;
+entry:
+ %a = alloca i32, align 4
+ %b = alloca i32, align 4
+ store i32 2, i32* %a, align 4
+ store i32 3, i32* %b, align 4
+ %al = load i32, i32* %a
+ %bl = load i32, i32* %b
+ %0 = icmp slt i32 %al, %bl
+ ret void
+}
+
+define void @outline_sgt() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @outline_sgt(
+; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*]] = alloca i32, align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[B:%.*]] = alloca i32, align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: call void @outlined_ir_func_1(i32* [[A]], i32* [[B]])
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
+;
+entry:
+ %a = alloca i32, align 4
+ %b = alloca i32, align 4
+ store i32 2, i32* %a, align 4
+ store i32 3, i32* %b, align 4
+ %al = load i32, i32* %a
+ %bl = load i32, i32* %b
+ %0 = icmp sgt i32 %bl, %al
+ ret void
+}
+
+; This has a swapped predicate, but not swapped operands, so it cannot use
+; the same outlined function as the ones above.
+
+define void @dontoutline_sgt() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @dontoutline_sgt(
+; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*]] = alloca i32, align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[B:%.*]] = alloca i32, align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i32 2, i32* [[A]], align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i32 3, i32* [[B]], align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[AL:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[A]], align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[BL:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[B]], align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP0:%.*]] = icmp sgt i32 [[AL]], [[BL]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
+;
+entry:
+ %a = alloca i32, align 4
+ %b = alloca i32, align 4
+ store i32 2, i32* %a, align 4
+ store i32 3, i32* %b, align 4
+ %al = load i32, i32* %a
+ %bl = load i32, i32* %b
+ %0 = icmp sgt i32 %al, %bl
+ ret void
+}
+
+; The below functions use a
diff erent kind of predicate that is not compatible
+; with the ones above, and should use a
diff erent outlined function.
+; The other
diff erence here is that the predicate with swapped operands comes
+; first this time.
+
+define void @outline_ugt1() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @outline_ugt1(
+; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*]] = alloca i32, align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[B:%.*]] = alloca i32, align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: call void @outlined_ir_func_0(i32* [[A]], i32* [[B]])
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
+;
+entry:
+ %a = alloca i32, align 4
+ %b = alloca i32, align 4
+ store i32 2, i32* %a, align 4
+ store i32 3, i32* %b, align 4
+ %al = load i32, i32* %a
+ %bl = load i32, i32* %b
+ %0 = icmp ugt i32 %al, %bl
+ ret void
+}
+
+define void @outline_ugt2() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @outline_ugt2(
+; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*]] = alloca i32, align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[B:%.*]] = alloca i32, align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: call void @outlined_ir_func_0(i32* [[A]], i32* [[B]])
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
+;
+entry:
+ %a = alloca i32, align 4
+ %b = alloca i32, align 4
+ store i32 2, i32* %a, align 4
+ store i32 3, i32* %b, align 4
+ %al = load i32, i32* %a
+ %bl = load i32, i32* %b
+ %0 = icmp ugt i32 %al, %bl
+ ret void
+}
+
+define void @outline_ult() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @outline_ult(
+; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*]] = alloca i32, align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[B:%.*]] = alloca i32, align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: call void @outlined_ir_func_0(i32* [[A]], i32* [[B]])
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
+;
+entry:
+ %a = alloca i32, align 4
+ %b = alloca i32, align 4
+ store i32 2, i32* %a, align 4
+ store i32 3, i32* %b, align 4
+ %al = load i32, i32* %a
+ %bl = load i32, i32* %b
+ %0 = icmp ult i32 %bl, %al
+ ret void
+}
+
+; CHECK: define internal void @outlined_ir_func_0(i32* [[ARG0:%.*]], i32* [[ARG1:%.*]]) #0 {
+; CHECK: entry_to_outline:
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i32 2, i32* [[ARG0]], align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i32 3, i32* [[ARG1]], align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[AL:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[ARG0]], align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[BL:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[ARG1]], align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP0:%.*]] = icmp ugt i32 [[AL]], [[BL]]
+
+; CHECK: define internal void @outlined_ir_func_1(i32* [[ARG0:%.*]], i32* [[ARG1:%.*]]) #0 {
+; CHECK: entry_to_outline:
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i32 2, i32* [[ARG0]], align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i32 3, i32* [[ARG1]], align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[AL:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[ARG0]], align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[BL:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[ARG1]], align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP0:%.*]] = icmp slt i32 [[AL]], [[BL]]
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifierTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifierTest.cpp
index 1eeba4fbf7c5..06a98a926350 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifierTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifierTest.cpp
@@ -154,8 +154,9 @@ TEST(IRInstructionMapper, PredicateDifferentiation) {
ASSERT_TRUE(UnsignedVec[0] != UnsignedVec[1]);
}
-// Checks that predicates with the same swapped predicate map to
diff erent
-// values.
+// Checks that predicates where that can be considered the same when the
+// operands are swapped, i.e. greater than to less than are mapped to the same
+// unsigned integer.
TEST(IRInstructionMapper, PredicateIsomorphism) {
StringRef ModuleString = R"(
define i32 @f(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
@@ -177,7 +178,7 @@ TEST(IRInstructionMapper, PredicateIsomorphism) {
ASSERT_TRUE(InstrList.size() == UnsignedVec.size());
ASSERT_TRUE(UnsignedVec.size() == 3);
- ASSERT_TRUE(UnsignedVec[0] != UnsignedVec[1]);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(UnsignedVec[0] == UnsignedVec[1]);
}
// Checks that the same predicate maps to the same value.
@@ -1375,6 +1376,49 @@ TEST(IRSimilarityCandidate, CheckIdenticalInstructions) {
ASSERT_TRUE(IRSimilarityCandidate::isSimilar(Cand1, Cand2));
}
+// Checks that comparison instructions are found to be similar instructions
+// when the operands are flipped and the predicate is also swapped.
+TEST(IRSimilarityCandidate, PredicateIsomorphism) {
+ StringRef ModuleString = R"(
+ define i32 @f(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
+ bb0:
+ %0 = icmp sgt i32 %a, %b
+ %1 = add i32 %b, %a
+ br label %bb1
+ bb1:
+ %2 = icmp slt i32 %a, %b
+ %3 = add i32 %a, %b
+ ret i32 0
+ })";
+ LLVMContext Context;
+ std::unique_ptr<Module> M = makeLLVMModule(Context, ModuleString);
+
+ std::vector<IRInstructionData *> InstrList;
+ std::vector<unsigned> UnsignedVec;
+
+ getVectors(*M, InstrList, UnsignedVec);
+
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(InstrList.size() > 5);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(InstrList.size() == UnsignedVec.size());
+
+ std::vector<IRInstructionData *>::iterator Start, End;
+ Start = InstrList.begin();
+ End = InstrList.begin();
+
+ std::advance(End, 1);
+ IRSimilarityCandidate Cand1(0, 2, *Start, *End);
+
+ Start = InstrList.begin();
+ End = InstrList.begin();
+
+ std::advance(Start, 3);
+ std::advance(End, 4);
+ IRSimilarityCandidate Cand2(3, 2, *Start, *End);
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(IRSimilarityCandidate::isSimilar(Cand1, Cand2));
+}
+
// Checks that IRSimilarityCandidates wrapping these two regions of instructions
// are able to
diff erentiate between instructions that have
diff erent opcodes.
TEST(IRSimilarityCandidate, CheckRegionsDifferentInstruction) {
@@ -1567,6 +1611,61 @@ TEST(IRSimilarityCandidate, DifferentStructure) {
ASSERT_FALSE(longSimCandCompare(InstrList, true));
}
+// Checks that comparison instructions are found to have the same structure
+// when the operands are flipped and the predicate is also swapped.
+TEST(IRSimilarityCandidate, PredicateIsomorphismStructure) {
+ StringRef ModuleString = R"(
+ define i32 @f(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
+ bb0:
+ %0 = icmp sgt i32 %a, %b
+ %1 = add i32 %a, %b
+ br label %bb1
+ bb1:
+ %2 = icmp slt i32 %b, %a
+ %3 = add i32 %a, %b
+ ret i32 0
+ })";
+ LLVMContext Context;
+ std::unique_ptr<Module> M = makeLLVMModule(Context, ModuleString);
+
+ std::vector<IRInstructionData *> InstrList;
+ std::vector<unsigned> UnsignedVec;
+
+ getVectors(*M, InstrList, UnsignedVec);
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(InstrList.size() > 5);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(InstrList.size() == UnsignedVec.size());
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(longSimCandCompare(InstrList, true));
+}
+
+// Checks that
diff erent predicates are counted as diferent.
+TEST(IRSimilarityCandidate, PredicateDifference) {
+ StringRef ModuleString = R"(
+ define i32 @f(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
+ bb0:
+ %0 = icmp sge i32 %a, %b
+ %1 = add i32 %b, %a
+ br label %bb1
+ bb1:
+ %2 = icmp slt i32 %b, %a
+ %3 = add i32 %a, %b
+ ret i32 0
+ })";
+ LLVMContext Context;
+ std::unique_ptr<Module> M = makeLLVMModule(Context, ModuleString);
+
+ std::vector<IRInstructionData *> InstrList;
+ std::vector<unsigned> UnsignedVec;
+
+ getVectors(*M, InstrList, UnsignedVec);
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(InstrList.size() > 5);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(InstrList.size() == UnsignedVec.size());
+
+ ASSERT_FALSE(longSimCandCompare(InstrList));
+}
+
// Checks that the same structure is recognized between two candidates. The
// items %a and %b are used in the same way in both sets of instructions.
TEST(IRSimilarityCandidate, SameStructure) {
@@ -1798,6 +1897,39 @@ TEST(IRSimilarityIdentifier, MappingSimilarity) {
}
}
+// Check that we find instances of swapped predicate isomorphism. That is,
+// for predicates that can be flipped, e.g. greater than to less than,
+// we can identify that instances of these
diff erent literal predicates, but are
+// the same within a single swap can be found.
+TEST(IRSimilarityIdentifier, PredicateIsomorphism) {
+ StringRef ModuleString = R"(
+ define i32 @f(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
+ bb0:
+ %0 = add i32 %a, %b
+ %1 = icmp sgt i32 %b, %a
+ br label %bb1
+ bb1:
+ %2 = add i32 %a, %b
+ %3 = icmp slt i32 %a, %b
+ ret i32 0
+ })";
+ LLVMContext Context;
+ std::unique_ptr<Module> M = makeLLVMModule(Context, ModuleString);
+
+ std::vector<std::vector<IRSimilarityCandidate>> SimilarityCandidates;
+ getSimilarities(*M, SimilarityCandidates);
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(SimilarityCandidates.size() == 1);
+ for (std::vector<IRSimilarityCandidate> &Cands : SimilarityCandidates) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(Cands.size() == 2);
+ unsigned InstIdx = 0;
+ for (IRSimilarityCandidate &Cand : Cands) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(Cand.getStartIdx() == InstIdx);
+ InstIdx += 3;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
// Checks that constants are detected as the same operand in each use in the
// sequences of instructions. Also checks that we can find structural
// equivalence using constants. In this case the 1 has the same use pattern as
More information about the llvm-branch-commits
mailing list