[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] 9a6de74 - [MachineLICM] Add llvm debug messages to SinkIntoLoop. NFC.
Sjoerd Meijer via llvm-branch-commits
llvm-branch-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Dec 22 01:24:44 PST 2020
Author: Sjoerd Meijer
Date: 2020-12-22T09:19:43Z
New Revision: 9a6de74d5a9e11a7865ce4873ff3297b7efbb673
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9a6de74d5a9e11a7865ce4873ff3297b7efbb673
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9a6de74d5a9e11a7865ce4873ff3297b7efbb673.diff
LOG: [MachineLICM] Add llvm debug messages to SinkIntoLoop. NFC.
I am investigating sinking instructions back into the loop under high
register pressure. This is just a first NFC step to add some debug
messages that allows tracing of the decision making.
Added:
Modified:
llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineLICM.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineLICM.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineLICM.cpp
index bc7bb66a82fb6..7c356cf0e15b0 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineLICM.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineLICM.cpp
@@ -800,8 +800,13 @@ void MachineLICMBase::SinkIntoLoop() {
I != Preheader->instr_end(); ++I) {
// We need to ensure that we can safely move this instruction into the loop.
// As such, it must not have side-effects, e.g. such as a call has.
- if (IsLoopInvariantInst(*I) && !HasLoopPHIUse(&*I))
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LICM: Analysing sink candidate: " << *I);
+ if (IsLoopInvariantInst(*I) && !HasLoopPHIUse(&*I)) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LICM: Added as sink candidate.\n");
Candidates.push_back(&*I);
+ continue;
+ }
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LICM: Not added as sink candidate.\n");
}
for (MachineInstr *I : Candidates) {
@@ -811,8 +816,11 @@ void MachineLICMBase::SinkIntoLoop() {
if (!MRI->hasOneDef(MO.getReg()))
continue;
bool CanSink = true;
- MachineBasicBlock *B = nullptr;
+ MachineBasicBlock *SinkBlock = nullptr;
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LICM: Try sinking: " << *I);
+
for (MachineInstr &MI : MRI->use_instructions(MO.getReg())) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LICM: Analysing use: "; MI.dump());
// FIXME: Come up with a proper cost model that estimates whether sinking
// the instruction (and thus possibly executing it on every loop
// iteration) is more expensive than a register.
@@ -821,24 +829,40 @@ void MachineLICMBase::SinkIntoLoop() {
CanSink = false;
break;
}
- if (!B) {
- B = MI.getParent();
+ if (!SinkBlock) {
+ SinkBlock = MI.getParent();
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LICM: Setting sink block to: "
+ << printMBBReference(*SinkBlock) << "\n");
continue;
}
- B = DT->findNearestCommonDominator(B, MI.getParent());
- if (!B) {
+ SinkBlock = DT->findNearestCommonDominator(SinkBlock, MI.getParent());
+ if (!SinkBlock) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LICM: Can't find nearest dominator\n");
CanSink = false;
break;
}
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LICM: Setting nearest common dom block: " <<
+ printMBBReference(*SinkBlock) << "\n");
+ }
+ if (!CanSink) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LICM: Can't sink instruction.\n");
+ continue;
}
- if (!CanSink || !B || B == Preheader)
+ if (!SinkBlock) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LICM: Not sinking, can't find sink block.\n");
continue;
+ }
+ if (SinkBlock == Preheader) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LICM: Not sinking, sink block is the preheader\n");
+ continue;
+ }
- LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Sinking to " << printMBBReference(*B) << " from "
- << printMBBReference(*I->getParent()) << ": " << *I);
- B->splice(B->getFirstNonPHI(), Preheader, I);
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LICM: Sinking to " << printMBBReference(*SinkBlock)
+ << " from " << printMBBReference(*I->getParent())
+ << ": " << *I);
+ SinkBlock->splice(SinkBlock->getFirstNonPHI(), Preheader, I);
- // The instruction is is moved from its basic block, so do not retain the
+ // The instruction is moved from its basic block, so do not retain the
// debug information.
assert(!I->isDebugInstr() && "Should not sink debug inst");
I->setDebugLoc(DebugLoc());
@@ -1028,6 +1052,7 @@ bool MachineLICMBase::IsLICMCandidate(MachineInstr &I) {
bool DontMoveAcrossStore = true;
if ((!I.isSafeToMove(AA, DontMoveAcrossStore)) &&
!(HoistConstStores && isInvariantStore(I, TRI, MRI))) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LICM: Instruction not safe to move.\n");
return false;
}
@@ -1038,8 +1063,10 @@ bool MachineLICMBase::IsLICMCandidate(MachineInstr &I) {
// indexed load from a jump table.
// Stores and side effects are already checked by isSafeToMove.
if (I.mayLoad() && !mayLoadFromGOTOrConstantPool(I) &&
- !IsGuaranteedToExecute(I.getParent()))
+ !IsGuaranteedToExecute(I.getParent())) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LICM: Load not guaranteed to execute.\n");
return false;
+ }
// Convergent attribute has been used on operations that involve inter-thread
// communication which results are implicitly affected by the enclosing
@@ -1056,8 +1083,10 @@ bool MachineLICMBase::IsLICMCandidate(MachineInstr &I) {
/// physical registers aren't accessed explicitly, and there are no side
/// effects that aren't captured by the operands or other flags.
bool MachineLICMBase::IsLoopInvariantInst(MachineInstr &I) {
- if (!IsLICMCandidate(I))
+ if (!IsLICMCandidate(I)) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LICM: Instruction not a LICM candidate\n");
return false;
+ }
// The instruction is loop invariant if all of its operands are.
for (const MachineOperand &MO : I.operands()) {
More information about the llvm-branch-commits
mailing list