[lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [lit] check-all hanging
Adrian Prantl via lldb-dev
lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jan 3 14:47:59 PST 2019
> On Jan 3, 2019, at 8:30 AM, Frédéric Riss <friss at apple.com> wrote:
>
> -llvm-dev + lldb-dev for the lldv test failures.
>
>> On Jan 3, 2019, at 7:33 AM, Joel E. Denny <jdenny.ornl at gmail.com <mailto:jdenny.ornl at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> Expected Passes : 57489
>> Expected Failures : 276
>> Unsupported Tests : 1883
>> Unexpected Passes : 2
>> Unexpected Failures: 54
>>
>> 14 warning(s) in tests.
>> FAILED: CMakeFiles/check-all
>> ```
>>
>> I immediately ran it again and saw one new unexpected fail:
>>
>> ```
>> lldb-Suite :: tools/lldb-mi/syntax/TestMiSyntax.py
>> ```
>
> Adrian, do we have remaining flakiness in the MI tests? Is this one of the GSoc tests?
That particular test still uses pexpect and needs to be rewritten as a LIT-based test; so, yes.
-- adrian
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20190103/0c0aab49/attachment.html>
More information about the lldb-dev
mailing list