[lldb-dev] Bugzilla default-assignee vs default-cc

Raphael Isemann via lldb-dev lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Apr 12 01:55:37 PDT 2019

Can't we just have a list like lldb-bugs (similar to llvm-bugs) as the
default-cc? This way I would have all the bugzilla talk also available
in my mail, which means I can use my mail client to read comments and
search them. And people that don't care about every bug update just
don't subscribe to this list.

- Raphael

Am Fr., 12. Apr. 2019 um 10:33 Uhr schrieb Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
<lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org>:
> On 12/04/2019 10:25, Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev wrote:
> > I was talking to one of the Bugzilla admins (Kristof) earlier today and
> > he pointed out that the default assignee for lldb bugs in the lldb-dev
> > list, and that it might be better to change that from default-assignee
> > to default-cc. That way, when the bug gets assigned, the mailing list
> > continues to get updates.
> >
> > I guess changing this depends on what our intentions are: do we just
> > want to notify the mailing list of new bugs or if we want to keep the
> > list in the loop for every bug. The latter might mean more traffic,
> > depending on how many people actually assign bugs to themselves.
> >
> > Please speak up if you think this is worth changing!
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jonas
> >
> I actually think the current behaviour strikes a good balance for the
> noise-to-signal ratio.
> Speaking for myself, I wouldn't want to get an email for every update to
> all lldb bugs out there. However, I like to have an overview of new bugs
> coming in, and when I find a particular bug interesting, I can always
> add myself to the cc list so I am notified of updates to the bugs I care
> about.
> pl
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

More information about the lldb-dev mailing list