[lldb-dev] increase timeout for tests?

[Greg Clayton via lldb-dev]

It would be great to look into these and see what is taking so long. Some tests are doing way too much work and should be split up. But it would be great to see if we have any tests that are not good tests and are just taking too much time for no reason (like the watchpoint tests were that Pavel fixed).

Greg


> On Mar 8, 2018, at 9:11 AM, Davide Italiano via lldb-dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> I've noticed some of the tests we have trigger timeouts when running in debug.
> 
> TIMEOUT: test_NSError_p_dwarf (lang/objc/foundation/TestObjCMethods2.py)
> TIMEOUT: test_expression_lookups_objc_dwarf
> (lang/objc/foundation/TestObjCMethods.py)
> TIMEOUT: test_expressions_in_literals_dsym
> (lang/objc/objc-new-syntax/TestObjCNewSyntax.py)
> TIMEOUT: test_frame_var_after_stop_at_interface_gmodules
> (lang/objc/real-definition/TestRealDefinition.py)
> TIMEOUT: test_frame_variable_across_modules_gmodules
> (lang/objc/hidden-ivars/TestHiddenIvars.py)
> TIMEOUT: test_kvo_with_run_command_gmodules
> (functionalities/data-formatter/data-formatter-objc/TestDataFormatterObjC.py)
> TIMEOUT: test_long_long_type_gmodules (types/TestIntegerTypesExpr.py)
> TIMEOUT: test_long_type_gmodules (types/TestIntegerTypes.py)
> TIMEOUT: test_rdar11106605_with_run_command_gmodules
> (functionalities/data-formatter/data-formatter-objc/nsstring/TestDataFormatterNSString.py)
> TIMEOUT: test_sb_api_listener_event_process_state
> (api/multithreaded/TestMultithreaded.py)
> TIMEOUT: test_scope_ambiguity_after_using_lookup_with_run_command_gmodules
> (lang/cpp/namespace/TestNamespaceLookup.py)
> TIMEOUT: test_set_auto_confirm_gmodules (settings/TestSettings.py)
> TIMEOUT: test_step_over_load_gmodules
> (functionalities/load_unload/TestLoadUnload.py)
> TIMEOUT: test_uint32_t_gmodules (lang/cpp/enum_types/TestCPP11EnumTypes.py)
> 
> There's nothing fundamentally broken with these tests, it's just that
> they take forever.
> What do you think about increasing the timeout for single tests?
> Alternatively, we could start splitting these tests into smaller
> tests.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> --
> Davide
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev