[lldb-dev] Push work-in-progress plugin for Process NetBSD?
Jim Ingham via lldb-dev
lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon May 16 11:32:59 PDT 2016
Provided it builds everywhere and you are planning on continuing to work on it, I see no problems with putting this into the lldb tree. If there are any parts that touch common code, you might want to submit those first (in appropriate chunks) so that the people who are going to review it can see the parts that touch their areas more clearly, then add in the independent code when the groundwork is settled.
Jim
> On May 12, 2016, at 6:28 PM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> I think it's fine, but I'll let others comment on that too.
>
> But i will say, if you do this, please make sure it's clang-formatted.
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 6:23 PM Kamil Rytarowski via lldb-dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> I keep locally almost 5k lines of code of the process plugin for NetBSD.
>
> It's still not functional (there are bugs), but it has all or mostly all
> of the code needed for amd64. Is it fine to push it upstream and
> continue development against the version in-tree?
>
> My code is based on FreeBSD with removed unsupported features, missing
> in the current version of NetBSD.
>
> It will be easier for me to keep it in sync with HEAD and should be
> usable for other teams to take it into account in further changes.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
More information about the lldb-dev
mailing list