[lldb-dev] 7th build slot?

[Todd Fiala via lldb-dev]

Okay, thanks.

It would be awesome if the summary listed the specific versions of clang
being used.  TOT is obvious, but "clang" being 3.5 is less so.

Seeing as clang behavior can change between releases, perhaps we can use
the other slots for other clang versions?

TOT clearly makes sense if more than one is being done. But if 4 slots
could be dedicated to clang, it seems like:
TOT (latest, 3.8 now)
TOT - 1 (3.7)
TOT - 2 (3.6)
TOT - 3 (3.5)

Or perhaps:
TOT (latest, 3.8)
TOT - 1 (3.7)
TOT - 2 (3.6)
TOT - *HISTORICALLY INTERESTING CLANG* (perhaps 3.4, 3.2, 3.0, whatever).

Just some thoughts.  Nice that the tests run so fast.  I've only got them
running in 2.5 minutes here, looks like your build bot does it in 1.5 :-)

-Todd

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Chaoren Lin <chaorenl at google.com> wrote:

> We gave each bot 8 slots due to some limitation with the build master.
> Slots 1-6 will notify us of failures, and slots 7-8 are sort of reserved
> for tests/builds that are expected to be broken. Ying can provide more
> details.
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Chaoren,
>>
>> While looking at the Ubuntu 14.04 x86_64 build bot, I was looking at the
>> test configurations for the test slots.  6 of them are described in the
>> build summary on the upper right
>> <http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.04-cmake/builds/6281>  There
>> is a 7th and 8th test slot that are not described --- what happens in those
>> slots?  Are they just unconfigured and thus not used?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -Todd
>>
>
>


-- 
-Todd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20150914/c987e943/attachment-0001.html>