[lldb-dev] Difference of behaviour of process.Continue() between MacOSX and Linux

[Louis Granboulan via lldb-dev]

Thank you for your quick answer.
I am using lldb 3.6.0 (the only one packaged for this Ubuntu).
I will see if a more recent Ubuntu has lldb 3.7, or try to install a recent
version from the sources.
Regards,
Louis

On 8 September 2015 at 14:58, Pavel Labath <labath at google.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> thanks for your report.
>
> Let me first ask you a question. Which version of lldb are you using?
>
> If it's anything less than 3.7, then I strongly recommend to upgrade,
> since linux support was not in a very good state there. If you are
> using 3.7 or svn, then the thing you are describing should work. If it
> does not please send your script along with your test app (or better
> yet, file a bug at <llvm.org/bugs> and I will take a look.
>
> cheers,
> pl
>
>
> On 8 September 2015 at 13:29, Louis Granboulan via lldb-dev
> <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I am new to lldb-dev and I hope that this issue has not already been
> > reported. I did not find any reference of it.
> >
> > I started with the example from section "Using the lldb.py module in
> python"
> > of
> > http://lldb.llvm.org/python-reference.html
> > and decided to have the process continue after having printed some
> > information about the breakpoint context. It allows to have multiple
> > breakpoints and display information about every breakpoint, or to have a
> > breakpoint at a function that is called many times and to display
> > information for every call.
> >
> > On a MacOSX machine (any recent version) it works well, but on a Linux
> > machine (Ubuntu 14.04 64 bits) it looks like process.Continue() makes the
> > program continue at the breakpoint instead of at the instruction
> following
> > the breakpoint. Therefore, it enters an infinite loop.
> >
> > I can attach the python script, but this script is just made by taking
> the
> > example of the webpage, putting in a "while True" loop everything after
> > "state = process.GetState()" and adding at the end of the loop the
> > instruction "process.Continue()".
> >
> > Regards,
> > Louis
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lldb-dev mailing list
> > lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20150908/9aa92f73/attachment.html>