[lldb-dev] Is RequestReturnValue still relevant

[Keno Fischer]

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Jim Ingham <jingham at apple.com> wrote:

> That comment is outdated.  I don't remember what it was there for
> originally, svn says it is Greg's.  Maybe he remembers.
>

Ok, great thanks. I think that comment can be deleted then, so I'll go
ahead and do that.


> What are you trying to do?
>

 I'm building a different front end on top of LLDB and that comment
confused me because it seemed to work fine without, but I wanted to make
sure I wasn't missing something that would come back to bite me. At the
current step, my goal is to
run some locally generated IR in the remote process, which I think I now
managed to do.



> Jim
>
>
> > On Jun 18, 2015, at 10:44 PM, Keno Fischer <kfischer at college.harvard.edu>
> wrote:
> >
> > In ThreadPlanCallFunction.h I saw
> >
> >    67      // To get the return value from a function call you must
> create a
> >    68      // lldb::ValueSP that contains a valid clang type in its
> context and call
> >    69:     // RequestReturnValue. The ValueSP will be stored and when
> the function is
> >    70      // done executing, the object will check if there is a
> requested return
> >    71      // value. If there is, the return value will be retrieved
> using the
> >
> > I suspect this comment is just outdated, but is there anything special
> that needs to be done in order to be able to get the return value?
> >
> > Keno
> > _______________________________________________
> > lldb-dev mailing list
> > lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20150619/e725cca0/attachment.html>