[lldb-dev] Disassembling with no function bounds

Kate Stone katherine_stone at apple.com
Wed Jan 21 16:08:01 PST 2015


We should definitely get test coverage in place along with a fix to ensure that we’re not surprised by future regressions.

Kate Stone k8stone at apple.com <mailto:k8stone at apple.com>
 Xcode Runtime Analysis Tools

> On Jan 21, 2015, at 3:56 PM, Jason Molenda <jmolenda at apple.com> wrote:
> 
> This could be r179258 from April 2013 that broke it.
> 
>> On Jan 21, 2015, at 3:04 PM, jingham at apple.com wrote:
>> 
>> Yeah, my guess is the change to make "dis" mean disassemble the current function did it, and that was a while ago.  Initially, dis didn't mean anything except as the repeat command.
>> 
>> Jim
>> 
>>> On Jan 21, 2015, at 2:54 PM, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 21 January 2015 at 17:35,  <jingham at apple.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> "source list" does the same trick disassemble was SUPPOSED to do.
>>>> 
>>>> But with TOT lldb, something seems to have broken that:
>>> 
>>> It looks like it's been broken for quite some time: We have an LLDB
>>> snapshot in the FreeBSD base system, and the version on my desktop is
>>> from around r202189. It shows the same behaviour.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> lldb-dev mailing list
>> lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20150121/61b6e181/attachment.html>


More information about the lldb-dev mailing list