<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">We should definitely get test coverage in place along with a fix to ensure that we’re not surprised by future regressions.<div class=""><br class=""><div class="">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="" style="font-family: LucidaGrande; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><font color="#424242" class="" style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande'; font-size: x-small;">Kate Stone</font><span class="" style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande'; font-size: x-small;"> </span><font color="#009193" class="" style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande'; font-size: x-small;"><a href="mailto:k8stone@apple.com" class="">k8stone@apple.com</a></font></div><div class="" style="font-family: Times; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><font face="Lucida Grande" size="1" class=""><font color="#009193" class=""></font> Xcode <font color="#424242" class="">Runtime Analysis Tools</font></font></div></div></div>
</div>
<br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jan 21, 2015, at 3:56 PM, Jason Molenda <<a href="mailto:jmolenda@apple.com" class="">jmolenda@apple.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">This could be r179258 from April 2013 that broke it.<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">On Jan 21, 2015, at 3:04 PM, <a href="mailto:jingham@apple.com" class="">jingham@apple.com</a> wrote:<br class=""><br class="">Yeah, my guess is the change to make "dis" mean disassemble the current function did it, and that was a while ago. Initially, dis didn't mean anything except as the repeat command.<br class=""><br class="">Jim<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">On Jan 21, 2015, at 2:54 PM, Ed Maste <<a href="mailto:emaste@freebsd.org" class="">emaste@freebsd.org</a>> wrote:<br class=""><br class="">On 21 January 2015 at 17:35, <<a href="mailto:jingham@apple.com" class="">jingham@apple.com</a>> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class="">"source list" does the same trick disassemble was SUPPOSED to do.<br class=""><br class="">But with TOT lldb, something seems to have broken that:<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">It looks like it's been broken for quite some time: We have an LLDB<br class="">snapshot in the FreeBSD base system, and the version on my desktop is<br class="">from around r202189. It shows the same behaviour.<br class=""></blockquote><br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">lldb-dev mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu" class="">lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu</a><br class="">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev<br class=""></blockquote><br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">lldb-dev mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu" class="">lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu</a><br class="">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>