[lldb-dev] test results look typical?

Tue Aug 25 10:04:32 PDT 2015

Okay.

So the culprit then is that I'm using:
cmake -GNinja ../llvm

with one extra flag for build type.  And cmake is then just choosing
/usr/bin/cc.

We could improve this by having the compiler symbolic links fully resolved:
/usr/bin/cc -> /etc/alternatives/cc -> /usr/bin/gcc, which would have then
caught that it doesn't support libc++.

Couldn't we use gcc with libc++?  (i.e. is it sufficient to assume we don't
have libc++ if we're using gcc?)  I have never tried that combo but I don't
know that it is impossible.  (After all, I just added libc++-dev to the
system, which presumably I can link against).

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Tamas Berghammer <tberghammer at google.com>
wrote:

> In theory the test should be skipped when you are using gcc (cc is an
> alias for it) but we detect the type of the compiler based on the
> executable name and in case of cc we don't recognize that it is a gcc, so
> we don't skip the test.
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:45 PM Chaoren Lin via lldb-dev <
> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> You're using CC="/usr/bin/cc". It needs to be clang for USE_LIBCPP to do
>> anything. :/
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Here are a couple of the failures that came up (the log output from the
>>> full dosep.py run).
>>>
>>> Let me know if that is not sufficient!
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Pavel Labath <labath at google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> There's no need to do anything fancy (yet :) ). For initial diagnosis
>>>> the output of `./dotest.py $your_usual_options -p SomeLibcxxTest.py
>>>> -t` should suffice.
>>>>
>>>> pl
>>>>
>>>> On 25 August 2015 at 16:45, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > Thanks, Pavel!  I'll dig that up and get back.
>>>> >
>>>> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Pavel Labath <labath at google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> There is no separate option, it should just work. :)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I'm betting you are still missing some package there (we should
>>>> >> document the prerequisites better). Could you send the error message
>>>> >> you are getting so we can have a look.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> cheers,
>>>> >> pl
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On 25 August 2015 at 16:20, Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
>>>> >> <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com>
>>>> >> > wrote:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Chaoren Lin <chaorenl at google.com
>>>> >
>>>> >> >> wrote:
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> The TestDataFormatterLibcc* tests require libc++-dev:
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> $ sudo apt-get install libc++-dev
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Ah okay, so we are working with libc++ on Ubuntu, that's good to
>>>> hear.
>>>> >> >> Pre-14.04 I gave up on it.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Will cmake automatically choose libc++ if it is present?  Or do I
>>>> need
>>>> >> >> to
>>>> >> >> pass something to cmake to use libc++?
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Hmm it appears I need to do more than just install libc++-dev.  I
>>>> did a
>>>> >> > clean build with that installed, then ran the tests, and I still
>>>> have
>>>> >> > the
>>>> >> > Libcxc/Libcxx tests failing.  Is there some flag expected, either
>>>> to
>>>> >> > pass
>>>> >> > along for the compile options to dotest.py to override/specify
>>>> which c++
>>>> >> > lib
>>>> >> > it is using?
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Thanks, Chaoren!
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> -Todd
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
>>>> >> >>> <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>> >> >>>>
>>>> >> >>>>
>>>> >> >>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Zachary Turner <
>>>> zturner at google.com>
>>>> >> >>>> wrote:
>>>> >> >>>>>
>>>> >> >>>>> Can't comment on the failures for Linux, but I don't think we
>>>> have a
>>>> >> >>>>> good handle on the unexpected successes.  I only added that
>>>> >> >>>>> information to
>>>> >> >>>>> the output about a week ago, before that unexpected successes
>>>> were
>>>> >> >>>>> actually
>>>> >> >>>>> going unnoticed.
>>>> >> >>>>
>>>> >> >>>>
>>>> >> >>>> Okay, thanks Zachary.   A while back we had some flapping tests
>>>> that
>>>> >> >>>> would oscillate between unexpected success and failure on Linux.
>>>> >> >>>> Some of
>>>> >> >>>> those might still be in that state but maybe (!) are fixed.
>>>> >> >>>>
>>>> >> >>>> Anyone on the Linux end who happens to know if the fails in
>>>> >> >>>> particular
>>>> >> >>>> look normal, that'd be good to know.
>>>> >> >>>>
>>>> >> >>>> Thanks!
>>>> >> >>>>
>>>> >> >>>>>
>>>> >> >>>>>
>>>> >> >>>>> It's likely that someone could just go in there and remove the
>>>> XFAIL
>>>> >> >>>>> from those tests.
>>>> >> >>>>>
>>>> >> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:37 PM Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
>>>> >> >>>>> <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >>>>>> Hi all,
>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >>>>>> I'm just trying to get a handle on current lldb test failures
>>>> >> >>>>>> across
>>>> >> >>>>>> different platforms.
>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >>>>>> On Linux on non-virtualized hardware, I currently see the
>>>> failures
>>>> >> >>>>>> below on Ubuntu 14.04.2 using a setup like this:
>>>> >> >>>>>> * stock linker (ld.bfd),
>>>> >> >>>>>> * g++ 4.9.2
>>>> >> >>>>>> * cmake
>>>> >> >>>>>> * ninja
>>>> >> >>>>>> * libstdc++
>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >>>>>> ninja check-lldb output:
>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >>>>>> Ran 394 test suites (15 failed) (3.807107%)
>>>> >> >>>>>> Ran 474 test cases (17 failed) (3.586498%)
>>>> >> >>>>>> Failing Tests (15)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestCPPThis.py (Linux rad
>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic
>>>> >> >>>>>> #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccIterator.py
>>>> (Linux rad
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMap.py (Linux rad
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMultiMap.py
>>>> (Linux rad
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxMultiSet.py
>>>> (Linux rad
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxSet.py (Linux rad
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxString.py (Linux
>>>> rad
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterSkipSummary.py (Linux
>>>> rad
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterUnordered.py (Linux rad
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShowPrint.py (Linux rad
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestRegisterVariables.py (Linux rad
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStaticVariables.py (Linux rad
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStepNoDebug.py (Linux rad
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic
>>>> >> >>>>>> #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestTypedefArray.py (Linux rad
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic
>>>> >> >>>>>> #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestVectorTypesFormatting.py (Linux rad
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >>>>>> Unexpected Successes (10)
>>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestBatchMode.py (Linux
>>>> rad
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestEvents.py (Linux rad
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestExitDuringStep.py
>>>> (Linux
>>>> >> >>>>>> rad
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestFdLeak.py (Linux rad
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestInferiorAssert.py
>>>> (Linux
>>>> >> >>>>>> rad
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShow.py
>>>> (Linux rad
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiInterpreterExec.py
>>>> (Linux
>>>> >> >>>>>> rad 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC
>>>> 2015
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiSyntax.py (Linux rad
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestRaise.py (Linux rad
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestStubSetSID.py (Linux
>>>> rad
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >>>>>> On a similar setup, although bumped up to Ubuntu 14.04.3 and
>>>> now on
>>>> >> >>>>>> a
>>>> >> >>>>>> VMWare VM, everything else the same, I see a similar report
>>>> from
>>>> >> >>>>>> 'ninja
>>>> >> >>>>>> check-lldb':
>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >>>>>> Ran 394 test suites (17 failed) (4.314721%)
>>>> >> >>>>>> Ran 474 test cases (19 failed) (4.008439%)
>>>> >> >>>>>> Failing Tests (17)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestAttachResume.py (Linux lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestCPPThis.py (Linux lldb
>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic
>>>> >> >>>>>> #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015 x86_64
>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccIterator.py
>>>> (Linux lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMap.py (Linux lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMultiMap.py
>>>> (Linux lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxMultiSet.py
>>>> (Linux
>>>> >> >>>>>> lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxSet.py (Linux
>>>> lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxString.py (Linux
>>>> lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterSkipSummary.py (Linux
>>>> lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterUnordered.py (Linux
>>>> lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShowPrint.py (Linux lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestRegisterVariables.py (Linux lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStaticVariables.py (Linux lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStepNoDebug.py (Linux lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic
>>>> >> >>>>>> #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015 x86_64
>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStepOverWatchpoint.py (Linux lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestTypedefArray.py (Linux lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestVectorTypesFormatting.py (Linux lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >>>>>> Unexpected Successes (11)
>>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestBatchMode.py (Linux
>>>> lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestEvents.py (Linux lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestExitDuringStep.py
>>>> (Linux
>>>> >> >>>>>> lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestFdLeak.py (Linux lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestInferiorAssert.py
>>>> (Linux
>>>> >> >>>>>> lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShow.py
>>>> (Linux lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiInterpreterExec.py
>>>> (Linux
>>>> >> >>>>>> lldb 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12
>>>> 14:09:17
>>>> >> >>>>>> UTC 2015
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiSyntax.py (Linux
>>>> lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestRaise.py (Linux lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestStubSetSID.py (Linux
>>>> lldb
>>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>> UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) ::
>>>> TestWatchedVarHitWhenInScope.py
>>>> >> >>>>>> (Linux lldb 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug
>>>> 12
>>>> >> >>>>>> 14:09:17 UTC
>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>> >> >>>>>> ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >>>>>> Do these more or less match the current state of affairs for
>>>> Linux
>>>> >> >>>>>> tests?  If not, are there any suggestions on best practices
>>>> for
>>>> >> >>>>>> upgrades?  A
>>>> >> >>>>>> while back I had tried things like clang and libc++ but I had
>>>> >> >>>>>> arrived at the
>>>> >> >>>>>> above setup (albeit typically with the gold linker) simply
>>>> due to
>>>> >> >>>>>> what
>>>> >> >>>>>> worked, what was easy to debug and what built fast.
>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >>>>>> Thanks for any confirmation on that!
>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >>>>>> --
>>>> >> >>>>>> -Todd
>>>> >> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> >>>>>> lldb-dev mailing list
>>>> >> >>>>>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>>> >> >>>>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>>>> >> >>>>
>>>> >> >>>>
>>>> >> >>>>
>>>> >> >>>>
>>>> >> >>>> --
>>>> >> >>>> -Todd
>>>> >> >>>>
>>>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> >>>> lldb-dev mailing list
>>>> >> >>>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>>> >> >>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>>>> >> >>>>
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> --
>>>> >> >> -Todd
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > --
>>>> >> > -Todd
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > _______________________________________________
>>>> >> > lldb-dev mailing list
>>>> >> > lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>>> >> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>>>> >> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > -Todd
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -Todd
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lldb-dev mailing list
>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>>
>

-- 
-Todd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20150825/78ea974d/attachment-0001.html>