<div dir="ltr">Okay.<div><br></div><div>So the culprit then is that I'm using:</div><div>cmake -GNinja ../llvm</div><div><br></div><div>with one extra flag for build type. And cmake is then just choosing /usr/bin/cc.</div><div><br></div><div>We could improve this by having the compiler symbolic links fully resolved:</div><div>/usr/bin/cc -> /etc/alternatives/cc -> /usr/bin/gcc, which would have then caught that it doesn't support libc++.</div><div><br></div><div>Couldn't we use gcc with libc++? (i.e. is it sufficient to assume we don't have libc++ if we're using gcc?) I have never tried that combo but I don't know that it is impossible. (After all, I just added libc++-dev to the system, which presumably I can link against).</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Tamas Berghammer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tberghammer@google.com" target="_blank">tberghammer@google.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">In theory the test should be skipped when you are using gcc (cc is an alias for it) but we detect the type of the compiler based on the executable name and in case of cc we don't recognize that it is a gcc, so we don't skip the test.<div><div class="h5"><div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:45 PM Chaoren Lin via lldb-dev <<a href="mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">You're using CC="/usr/bin/cc". It needs to be clang for USE_LIBCPP to do anything. :/</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Todd Fiala <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:todd.fiala@gmail.com" target="_blank">todd.fiala@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Here are a couple of the failures that came up (the log output from the full dosep.py run).<div><br></div><div>Let me know if that is not sufficient!</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Pavel Labath <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:labath@google.com" target="_blank">labath@google.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">There's no need to do anything fancy (yet :) ). For initial diagnosis<br>
the output of `./dotest.py $your_usual_options -p SomeLibcxxTest.py<br>
-t` should suffice.<br>
<span><font color="#888888"><br>
pl<br>
</font></span><div><div><br>
On 25 August 2015 at 16:45, Todd Fiala <<a href="mailto:todd.fiala@gmail.com" target="_blank">todd.fiala@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Thanks, Pavel! I'll dig that up and get back.<br>
><br>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Pavel Labath <<a href="mailto:labath@google.com" target="_blank">labath@google.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> There is no separate option, it should just work. :)<br>
>><br>
>> I'm betting you are still missing some package there (we should<br>
>> document the prerequisites better). Could you send the error message<br>
>> you are getting so we can have a look.<br>
>><br>
>> cheers,<br>
>> pl<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On 25 August 2015 at 16:20, Todd Fiala via lldb-dev<br>
>> <<a href="mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Todd Fiala <<a href="mailto:todd.fiala@gmail.com" target="_blank">todd.fiala@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> > wrote:<br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Chaoren Lin <<a href="mailto:chaorenl@google.com" target="_blank">chaorenl@google.com</a>><br>
>> >> wrote:<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> The TestDataFormatterLibcc* tests require libc++-dev:<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> $ sudo apt-get install libc++-dev<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Ah okay, so we are working with libc++ on Ubuntu, that's good to hear.<br>
>> >> Pre-14.04 I gave up on it.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Will cmake automatically choose libc++ if it is present? Or do I need<br>
>> >> to<br>
>> >> pass something to cmake to use libc++?<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > Hmm it appears I need to do more than just install libc++-dev. I did a<br>
>> > clean build with that installed, then ran the tests, and I still have<br>
>> > the<br>
>> > Libcxc/Libcxx tests failing. Is there some flag expected, either to<br>
>> > pass<br>
>> > along for the compile options to dotest.py to override/specify which c++<br>
>> > lib<br>
>> > it is using?<br>
>> ><br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Thanks, Chaoren!<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> -Todd<br>
>> >><br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Todd Fiala via lldb-dev<br>
>> >>> <<a href="mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Zachary Turner <<a href="mailto:zturner@google.com" target="_blank">zturner@google.com</a>><br>
>> >>>> wrote:<br>
>> >>>>><br>
>> >>>>> Can't comment on the failures for Linux, but I don't think we have a<br>
>> >>>>> good handle on the unexpected successes. I only added that<br>
>> >>>>> information to<br>
>> >>>>> the output about a week ago, before that unexpected successes were<br>
>> >>>>> actually<br>
>> >>>>> going unnoticed.<br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>> Okay, thanks Zachary. A while back we had some flapping tests that<br>
>> >>>> would oscillate between unexpected success and failure on Linux.<br>
>> >>>> Some of<br>
>> >>>> those might still be in that state but maybe (!) are fixed.<br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>> Anyone on the Linux end who happens to know if the fails in<br>
>> >>>> particular<br>
>> >>>> look normal, that'd be good to know.<br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>> Thanks!<br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>>><br>
>> >>>>><br>
>> >>>>> It's likely that someone could just go in there and remove the XFAIL<br>
>> >>>>> from those tests.<br>
>> >>>>><br>
>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:37 PM Todd Fiala via lldb-dev<br>
>> >>>>> <<a href="mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> Hi all,<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> I'm just trying to get a handle on current lldb test failures<br>
>> >>>>>> across<br>
>> >>>>>> different platforms.<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> On Linux on non-virtualized hardware, I currently see the failures<br>
>> >>>>>> below on Ubuntu 14.04.2 using a setup like this:<br>
>> >>>>>> * stock linker (ld.bfd),<br>
>> >>>>>> * g++ 4.9.2<br>
>> >>>>>> * cmake<br>
>> >>>>>> * ninja<br>
>> >>>>>> * libstdc++<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> ninja check-lldb output:<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> Ran 394 test suites (15 failed) (3.807107%)<br>
>> >>>>>> Ran 474 test cases (17 failed) (3.586498%)<br>
>> >>>>>> Failing Tests (15)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestCPPThis.py (Linux rad 3.13.0-57-generic<br>
>> >>>>>> #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccIterator.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMap.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMultiMap.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxMultiSet.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxSet.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxString.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterSkipSummary.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterUnordered.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShowPrint.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestRegisterVariables.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStaticVariables.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStepNoDebug.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic<br>
>> >>>>>> #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestTypedefArray.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic<br>
>> >>>>>> #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestVectorTypesFormatting.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> Unexpected Successes (10)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestBatchMode.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestEvents.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestExitDuringStep.py (Linux<br>
>> >>>>>> rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestFdLeak.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestInferiorAssert.py (Linux<br>
>> >>>>>> rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShow.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiInterpreterExec.py (Linux<br>
>> >>>>>> rad 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiSyntax.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestRaise.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestStubSetSID.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> On a similar setup, although bumped up to Ubuntu 14.04.3 and now on<br>
>> >>>>>> a<br>
>> >>>>>> VMWare VM, everything else the same, I see a similar report from<br>
>> >>>>>> 'ninja<br>
>> >>>>>> check-lldb':<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> Ran 394 test suites (17 failed) (4.314721%)<br>
>> >>>>>> Ran 474 test cases (19 failed) (4.008439%)<br>
>> >>>>>> Failing Tests (17)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestAttachResume.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestCPPThis.py (Linux lldb 3.19.0-26-generic<br>
>> >>>>>> #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccIterator.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMap.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMultiMap.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxMultiSet.py (Linux<br>
>> >>>>>> lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxSet.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxString.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterSkipSummary.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterUnordered.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShowPrint.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestRegisterVariables.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStaticVariables.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStepNoDebug.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic<br>
>> >>>>>> #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStepOverWatchpoint.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestTypedefArray.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestVectorTypesFormatting.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> Unexpected Successes (11)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestBatchMode.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestEvents.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestExitDuringStep.py (Linux<br>
>> >>>>>> lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestFdLeak.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestInferiorAssert.py (Linux<br>
>> >>>>>> lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShow.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiInterpreterExec.py (Linux<br>
>> >>>>>> lldb 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17<br>
>> >>>>>> UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiSyntax.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestRaise.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestStubSetSID.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestWatchedVarHitWhenInScope.py<br>
>> >>>>>> (Linux lldb 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12<br>
>> >>>>>> 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> Do these more or less match the current state of affairs for Linux<br>
>> >>>>>> tests? If not, are there any suggestions on best practices for<br>
>> >>>>>> upgrades? A<br>
>> >>>>>> while back I had tried things like clang and libc++ but I had<br>
>> >>>>>> arrived at the<br>
>> >>>>>> above setup (albeit typically with the gold linker) simply due to<br>
>> >>>>>> what<br>
>> >>>>>> worked, what was easy to debug and what built fast.<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> Thanks for any confirmation on that!<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> --<br>
>> >>>>>> -Todd<br>
>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> >>>>>> lldb-dev mailing list<br>
>> >>>>>> <a href="mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
>> >>>>>> <a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev</a><br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>> --<br>
>> >>>> -Todd<br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> >>>> lldb-dev mailing list<br>
>> >>>> <a href="mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
>> >>>> <a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev</a><br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>><br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >> --<br>
>> >> -Todd<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > --<br>
>> > -Todd<br>
>> ><br>
>> > _______________________________________________<br>
>> > lldb-dev mailing list<br>
>> > <a href="mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
>> > <a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev</a><br>
>> ><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> -Todd<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div></div></div><span><font color="#888888">-- <br><div><div dir="ltr">-Todd</div></div>
</font></span></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
lldb-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">-Todd</div></div>
</div>