[lldb-dev] test results look typical?

Tue Aug 25 09:45:17 PDT 2015

You're using CC="/usr/bin/cc". It needs to be clang for USE_LIBCPP to do
anything. :/

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com> wrote:

> Here are a couple of the failures that came up (the log output from the
> full dosep.py run).
>
> Let me know if that is not sufficient!
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Pavel Labath <labath at google.com> wrote:
>
>> There's no need to do anything fancy (yet :) ). For initial diagnosis
>> the output of `./dotest.py $your_usual_options -p SomeLibcxxTest.py
>> -t` should suffice.
>>
>> pl
>>
>> On 25 August 2015 at 16:45, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Thanks, Pavel!  I'll dig that up and get back.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Pavel Labath <labath at google.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> There is no separate option, it should just work. :)
>> >>
>> >> I'm betting you are still missing some package there (we should
>> >> document the prerequisites better). Could you send the error message
>> >> you are getting so we can have a look.
>> >>
>> >> cheers,
>> >> pl
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 25 August 2015 at 16:20, Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
>> >> <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Chaoren Lin <chaorenl at google.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> The TestDataFormatterLibcc* tests require libc++-dev:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> $ sudo apt-get install libc++-dev
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Ah okay, so we are working with libc++ on Ubuntu, that's good to
>> hear.
>> >> >> Pre-14.04 I gave up on it.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Will cmake automatically choose libc++ if it is present?  Or do I
>> need
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> pass something to cmake to use libc++?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Hmm it appears I need to do more than just install libc++-dev.  I
>> did a
>> >> > clean build with that installed, then ran the tests, and I still have
>> >> > the
>> >> > Libcxc/Libcxx tests failing.  Is there some flag expected, either to
>> >> > pass
>> >> > along for the compile options to dotest.py to override/specify which
>> c++
>> >> > lib
>> >> > it is using?
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks, Chaoren!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -Todd
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
>> >> >>> <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Zachary Turner <
>> zturner at google.com>
>> >> >>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Can't comment on the failures for Linux, but I don't think we
>> have a
>> >> >>>>> good handle on the unexpected successes.  I only added that
>> >> >>>>> information to
>> >> >>>>> the output about a week ago, before that unexpected successes
>> were
>> >> >>>>> actually
>> >> >>>>> going unnoticed.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Okay, thanks Zachary.   A while back we had some flapping tests
>> that
>> >> >>>> would oscillate between unexpected success and failure on Linux.
>> >> >>>> Some of
>> >> >>>> those might still be in that state but maybe (!) are fixed.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Anyone on the Linux end who happens to know if the fails in
>> >> >>>> particular
>> >> >>>> look normal, that'd be good to know.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Thanks!
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> It's likely that someone could just go in there and remove the
>> XFAIL
>> >> >>>>> from those tests.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:37 PM Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
>> >> >>>>> <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> Hi all,
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> I'm just trying to get a handle on current lldb test failures
>> >> >>>>>> across
>> >> >>>>>> different platforms.
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> On Linux on non-virtualized hardware, I currently see the
>> failures
>> >> >>>>>> below on Ubuntu 14.04.2 using a setup like this:
>> >> >>>>>> * stock linker (ld.bfd),
>> >> >>>>>> * g++ 4.9.2
>> >> >>>>>> * cmake
>> >> >>>>>> * ninja
>> >> >>>>>> * libstdc++
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> ninja check-lldb output:
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> Ran 394 test suites (15 failed) (3.807107%)
>> >> >>>>>> Ran 474 test cases (17 failed) (3.586498%)
>> >> >>>>>> Failing Tests (15)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestCPPThis.py (Linux rad
>> 3.13.0-57-generic
>> >> >>>>>> #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccIterator.py (Linux
>> rad
>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMap.py (Linux rad
>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMultiMap.py (Linux
>> rad
>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxMultiSet.py (Linux
>> rad
>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxSet.py (Linux rad
>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxString.py (Linux
>> rad
>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterSkipSummary.py (Linux rad
>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterUnordered.py (Linux rad
>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShowPrint.py (Linux rad
>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestRegisterVariables.py (Linux rad
>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStaticVariables.py (Linux rad
>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStepNoDebug.py (Linux rad
>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic
>> >> >>>>>> #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestTypedefArray.py (Linux rad
>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic
>> >> >>>>>> #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestVectorTypesFormatting.py (Linux rad
>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> Unexpected Successes (10)
>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestBatchMode.py (Linux rad
>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestEvents.py (Linux rad
>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestExitDuringStep.py (Linux
>> >> >>>>>> rad
>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestFdLeak.py (Linux rad
>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestInferiorAssert.py (Linux
>> >> >>>>>> rad
>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShow.py (Linux
>> rad
>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiInterpreterExec.py
>> (Linux
>> >> >>>>>> rad 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC
>> 2015
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiSyntax.py (Linux rad
>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestRaise.py (Linux rad
>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestStubSetSID.py (Linux rad
>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> On a similar setup, although bumped up to Ubuntu 14.04.3 and
>> now on
>> >> >>>>>> a
>> >> >>>>>> VMWare VM, everything else the same, I see a similar report from
>> >> >>>>>> 'ninja
>> >> >>>>>> check-lldb':
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> Ran 394 test suites (17 failed) (4.314721%)
>> >> >>>>>> Ran 474 test cases (19 failed) (4.008439%)
>> >> >>>>>> Failing Tests (17)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestAttachResume.py (Linux lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestCPPThis.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic
>> >> >>>>>> #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015 x86_64
>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccIterator.py (Linux
>> lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMap.py (Linux lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMultiMap.py (Linux
>> lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxMultiSet.py (Linux
>> >> >>>>>> lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxSet.py (Linux lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxString.py (Linux
>> lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterSkipSummary.py (Linux
>> lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterUnordered.py (Linux lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShowPrint.py (Linux lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestRegisterVariables.py (Linux lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStaticVariables.py (Linux lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStepNoDebug.py (Linux lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic
>> >> >>>>>> #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015 x86_64
>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStepOverWatchpoint.py (Linux lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestTypedefArray.py (Linux lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestVectorTypesFormatting.py (Linux lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> Unexpected Successes (11)
>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestBatchMode.py (Linux lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestEvents.py (Linux lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestExitDuringStep.py (Linux
>> >> >>>>>> lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestFdLeak.py (Linux lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestInferiorAssert.py (Linux
>> >> >>>>>> lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShow.py (Linux
>> lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiInterpreterExec.py
>> (Linux
>> >> >>>>>> lldb 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12
>> 14:09:17
>> >> >>>>>> UTC 2015
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiSyntax.py (Linux lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestRaise.py (Linux lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestStubSetSID.py (Linux
>> lldb
>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64
>> >> >>>>>> x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) ::
>> TestWatchedVarHitWhenInScope.py
>> >> >>>>>> (Linux lldb 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12
>> >> >>>>>> 14:09:17 UTC
>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> >> >>>>>> ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> Do these more or less match the current state of affairs for
>> Linux
>> >> >>>>>> tests?  If not, are there any suggestions on best practices for
>> >> >>>>>> upgrades?  A
>> >> >>>>>> while back I had tried things like clang and libc++ but I had
>> >> >>>>>> arrived at the
>> >> >>>>>> above setup (albeit typically with the gold linker) simply due
>> to
>> >> >>>>>> what
>> >> >>>>>> worked, what was easy to debug and what built fast.
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> Thanks for any confirmation on that!
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> --
>> >> >>>>>> -Todd
>> >> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>>>>> lldb-dev mailing list
>> >> >>>>>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> >> >>>>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> --
>> >> >>>> -Todd
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>>> lldb-dev mailing list
>> >> >>>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> >> >>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> -Todd
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > -Todd
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > lldb-dev mailing list
>> >> > lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> >> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > -Todd
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -Todd
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20150825/917b339f/attachment-0001.html>